VS
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGH) and JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VGH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while JAVA leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VGH features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.44% for JAVA. Performance-wise, VGH has returned 9.62% year-to-date with +$26 M in net flows, whereas JAVA is at 19.32% with +$97 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VGH
JAVA
| AuM | $1,043.30 M | $119.33 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.32% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VGH | +2.05% | -0.79% | +9.62% | +11.90% | +53.44% |
JAVA | +1.40% | +0.64% | +19.32% | +20.72% | - | |
| Flows | VGH | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$26 M | +$40 M | +$185 M |
JAVA | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$97 M | +$99 M | - |
VGH vs JAVA exposure
Countries
VGH
USA
95.23%
JAVA
USA
95.36%
Sectors
VGH
Technology
27.35%
Finance
19.41%
Healthcare
18.47%
Industrials
9.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.93%
Other
16.39%
JAVA
Technology
22.19%
Finance
21.73%
Healthcare
12.93%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.62%
Industrials
8.22%
Other
22.31%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VGH
Microsoft Corp.
4.89%
Apple, Inc.
4.87%
Broadcom Inc.
4.29%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.09%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.88%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.95%
Johnson & Johnson
2.82%
Visa, Inc.
2.52%
Walmart, Inc.
2.04%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.04%
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.43%
Microsoft Corp.
6.18%
Apple, Inc.
3.47%
Bank of America Corp.
2.25%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.14%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.09%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.77%
ConocoPhillips
1.74%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.56%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.53%
Diversification
VGH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 333 total
34.39%
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 147 total
30.16%
Characteristics
Compare
VGH
JAVA
| Provider | Vanguard | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Other | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.07% | 0.50% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | March 19, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about VGH and JAVA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VGH or JAVA?
As of November 6, 2026, VGH has returned 9.62% year to date, while JAVA has returned 19.32%. JAVA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VGH or JAVA?
As of November 6, 2026, VGH manages $1.04 B in assets, while JAVA manages $119.33 M. VGH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VGH and JAVA managed?
VGH is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark. JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VGH and JAVA emphasize?
VGH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. JAVA is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VGH or JAVA?
Year to date, VGH has seen +$25.62 M in net flows, compared with +$96.64 M for JAVA. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VGH and JAVA compare?
VGH has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of VGH and JAVA?
VGH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. JAVA's top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VGH or JAVA?
VGH holds 331 securities, while JAVA holds 147. On holdings count, VGH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VGH and JAVA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.