VS
Compare Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGH) vs Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VGH and VGG provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VGH features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.28% for VGG. Performance-wise, VGH has returned 7.97% year-to-date with +$22 M in net flows, whereas VGG is at 12.17% with +$77 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VGH
VGG
| AuM | $1,026.77 M | $2,598.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.32% | 0.31% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VGH | +2.10% | +5.15% | +7.97% | +13.84% | +43.37% |
VGG | +1.27% | +8.88% | +12.17% | +19.86% | +60.46% | |
| Flows | VGH | +$8 M | +$11 M | +$22 M | +$25 M | +$189 M |
VGG | +$26 M | +$51 M | +$77 M | +$130 M | +$705 M |
VGH vs VGG exposure
Countries
VGH
USA
94.25%
VGG
USA
94.25%
Sectors
VGH
Technology
26.83%
Finance
19.00%
Healthcare
17.55%
Industrials
9.70%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.00%
Other
17.92%
VGG
Technology
26.83%
Finance
19.00%
Healthcare
17.55%
Industrials
9.70%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.00%
Other
17.92%
As of July 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VGH
Broadcom Inc.
4.50%
Apple, Inc.
4.18%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.11%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.54%
Microsoft Corp.
3.49%
Johnson & Johnson
2.65%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.46%
Lam Research Corp.
2.35%
Visa, Inc.
2.30%
Walmart, Inc.
2.15%
VGG
Broadcom Inc.
4.50%
Apple, Inc.
4.18%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.11%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.54%
Microsoft Corp.
3.49%
Johnson & Johnson
2.65%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.46%
Lam Research Corp.
2.35%
Visa, Inc.
2.30%
Walmart, Inc.
2.15%
Diversification
VGH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 332 total
31.73%
VGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 332 total
31.73%
Characteristics
Compare
VGH
VGG
| Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.07% | 1.03% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | August 2, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about VGH and VGG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VGH or VGG?
As of July 24, 2026, VGH has returned 7.97% year to date, while VGG has returned 12.17%. VGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VGH or VGG?
As of July 24, 2026, VGH manages $1.03 B in assets, while VGG manages $2.60 B. VGG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VGH and VGG managed?
VGH is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark. VGG is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do VGH and VGG emphasize?
VGH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VGH or VGG?
Year to date, VGH has seen +$21.80 M in net flows, compared with +$77.10 M for VGG. VGG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VGH and VGG compare?
VGH has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while VGG has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What are the top holdings of VGH and VGG?
VGH's largest holdings include Broadcom Inc., Apple, Inc., and Eli Lilly & Co.. VGG's top holdings include Broadcom Inc., Apple, Inc., and Eli Lilly & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: VGH or VGG?
VGH holds 329 securities, while VGG holds 329. On holdings count, VGH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VGH and VGG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.