VS
When evaluating costs, VMO features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.45% for FCIV. Performance-wise, VMO has returned 13.19% year-to-date with +$148 M in net flows, whereas FCIV is at 16.68% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VMO
FCIV
| AuM | $476.70 M | $2,659.88 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.21% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VMO | -7.07% | -1.61% | +13.19% | +11.88% | +112.20% |
FCIV | -0.94% | -3.57% | +16.68% | +24.35% | +88.07% | |
| Flows | VMO | +$14 M | +$24 M | +$148 M | +$152 M | +$277 M |
FCIV | +$80 M | +$256 M | +$1,071 M | +$1,249 M | +$2,021 M |
VMO vs FCIV exposure
Countries
VMO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
VMO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VMO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
VMO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
VMO
FCIV
| Provider | Vanguard | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.76% | 2.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2016 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about VMO and FCIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VMO or FCIV?
As of October 30, 2026, VMO has returned 13.19% year to date, while FCIV has returned 16.68%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VMO or FCIV?
As of October 30, 2026, VMO manages $476.70 M in assets, while FCIV manages $2.66 B. FCIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VMO and FCIV managed?
VMO is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VMO or FCIV?
Year to date, VMO has seen +$148.38 M in net flows, compared with +$1,070.83 M for FCIV. FCIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VMO and FCIV compare?
VMO has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Recent articles about VMO and FCIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.