VRIF
Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio

Full VRIF fund page
VS
ZMI
BMO Monthly Income ETF

Full ZMI fund page

Compare Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF) vs BMO Monthly Income ETF (ZMI) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VRIF provides Sovereign, Banks, and Municipal exposures, while ZMI is primarily weighted in Financials, Information Technology, and Banks. When evaluating costs, VRIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.29%, compared to 0.18% for ZMI. Performance-wise, VRIF has returned 5.44% year-to-date with +$45 M in net flows, whereas ZMI is at 9.75% with +$23 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.0%May 15May 25Jun 1Jun 8Jun 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VRIF
+2.86%+4.64%+5.44%+12.81%+35.01%
ZMI
+3.31%+7.13%+9.75%+20.03%+46.84%
Flows
VRIF
+$2 M+$13 M+$45 M+$58 M-$3 M
ZMI
+$0 M+$6 M+$23 M+$54 M+$91 M

VRIF vs ZMI exposure

Countries

VRIF
Canada
66.69%
USA
12.74%
Other
20.57%
ZMI
USA
44.53%
Canada
43.18%
Other
12.30%

Sectors

VRIF
Other
20.63%
Sovereign
10.62%
Banks
8.49%
Municipal
7.36%
Other
52.90%
ZMI
Financials
13.10%
Other
11.61%
Information Technology
9.60%
Banks
8.73%
Energy
7.63%
Other
49.34%
As of June 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VRIF
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.64%
NVIDIA
0.50%
TORONTO DOMINION
0.46%
APPLE
0.43%
CA135087T537
0.40%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
0.38%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
0.38%
CA135087T388
0.37%
CA135087T792
0.36%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2035, CAD
0.35%
ZMI
CA05600A3082
4.82%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.37%
Royal Bank of Canada, 5.228% 24jun2030, CAD
1.36%
Bank of Nova Scotia, 4.442% 15nov2035, CAD
1.29%
APPLE
1.18%
ABBVIE
1.17%
CISCO-T
1.10%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.491% 8sep2028, CAD
1.07%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.03%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.00%

Diversification

VRIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,162 total
4.27%
ZMI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,218 total
15.40%

Characteristics

Compare
VRIF
ZMI
ProviderVanguardBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.71%3.91%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 9, 2020February 3, 2011

Frequently asked questions about VRIF and ZMI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VRIF or ZMI?
As of June 15, 2026, VRIF has returned 5.44% year to date, while ZMI has returned 9.75%. ZMI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VRIF or ZMI?
As of June 15, 2026, VRIF manages $360.32 M in assets, while ZMI manages $236.97 M. VRIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VRIF and ZMI managed?
VRIF is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. ZMI is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VRIF and ZMI emphasize?
VRIF is most exposed to Sovereign, Banks, and Municipal. ZMI is most exposed to Financials, Information Technology, and Banks.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VRIF or ZMI?
Year to date, VRIF has seen +$44.85 M in net flows, compared with +$22.80 M for ZMI. VRIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VRIF and ZMI compare?
VRIF has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while ZMI has an expense ratio of 0.20%.
What are the top holdings of VRIF and ZMI?
VRIF's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and NVIDIA. ZMI's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and Royal Bank of Canada, 5.228% 24jun2030, CAD.
Which ETF is more diversified: VRIF or ZMI?
VRIF holds 24629 securities, while ZMI holds 956. On holdings count, VRIF is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds