VS
When evaluating costs, VVO features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for FCUL. Performance-wise, VVO has returned 9.73% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas FCUL is at 13.48% with +$853 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VVO
FCUL
| AuM | $36.63 M | $2,364.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.69% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VVO | +1.61% | +2.19% | +9.73% | +10.19% | +45.92% |
FCUL | +4.21% | +3.89% | +13.48% | +9.80% | +53.33% | |
| Flows | VVO | -$6 M | -$9 M | -$4 M | -$4 M | -$4 M |
FCUL | +$67 M | +$190 M | +$853 M | +$1,082 M | +$1,991 M |
VVO vs FCUL exposure
Countries
VVO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
VVO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VVO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
VVO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
VVO
FCUL
| Provider | Vanguard | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada U.S. Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.95% | 1.42% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2016 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about VVO and FCUL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VVO or FCUL?
As of October 20, 2026, VVO has returned 9.73% year to date, while FCUL has returned 13.48%. FCUL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VVO or FCUL?
As of October 20, 2026, VVO manages $36.63 M in assets, while FCUL manages $2.36 B. FCUL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VVO and FCUL managed?
VVO is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. FCUL is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VVO or FCUL?
Year to date, VVO has seen -$4.40 M in net flows, compared with +$853.31 M for FCUL. FCUL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VVO and FCUL compare?
VVO has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while FCUL has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about VVO and FCUL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.