VS
When evaluating costs, VXM.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VXM.U
HBNK
| AuM | $1.04 M | $626.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.37% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VXM.U | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | +9.39% | +10.05% | +11.97% | +71.28% | - | |
| Flows | VXM.U | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | -$251 M | -$459 M | -$500 M | -$759 M | - |
VXM.U vs HBNK exposure
Countries
VXM.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.69%
Sectors
VXM.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.69%
As of April 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VXM.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.35%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.25%
BNS
16.27%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.76%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.48%
Diversification
VXM.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.69%
Characteristics
Compare
VXM.U
HBNK
| Provider | CI | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Value Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.94% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 7, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about VXM.U and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VXM.U or HBNK?
As of April 15, 2026, VXM.U manages $1.04 M in assets, while HBNK manages $626.43 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VXM.U and HBNK managed?
VXM.U is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Value Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of VXM.U and HBNK compare?
VXM.U has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about VXM.U and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.