VS
When evaluating costs, WHYP features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
WHYP
ZUT
| AuM | $3.39 M | $805.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WHYP | - | - | - | - | - |
ZUT | -5.59% | -7.33% | +11.61% | +17.34% | +47.29% | |
| Flows | WHYP | - | - | - | - | - |
ZUT | +$5 M | -$17 M | -$95 M | -$106 M | +$217 M |
WHYP vs ZUT exposure
Countries
WHYP
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
WHYP
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
WHYP
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
WHYP
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
WHYP
ZUT
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | September 9, 2026 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about WHYP and ZUT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: WHYP or ZUT?
As of September 11, 2026, WHYP manages $3.39 M in assets, while ZUT manages $805.63 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are WHYP and ZUT managed?
WHYP is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of WHYP and ZUT compare?
WHYP has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about WHYP and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.