WOMN
BMO Women In Leadership Fund ETF

Full WOMN fund page
VS
MWMN
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF

Full MWMN fund page

Compare BMO Women In Leadership Fund ETF (WOMN) vs Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF (MWMN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. WOMN provides Financials, Information Technology, and Energy exposures, while MWMN is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Financials, and Health Care. When evaluating costs, WOMN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.55% for MWMN. Performance-wise, WOMN has returned 3.05% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas MWMN is at 5.03% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
WOMN
+3.50%+7.15%+3.05%+12.28%+55.60%
MWMN
+3.88%+3.57%+5.03%+20.46%+46.39%
Flows
WOMN
+$0 M+$1 M+$0 M-$1 M+$1 M
MWMN
+$0 M+$1 M+$1 M-$5 M-$22 M

WOMN vs MWMN exposure

Countries

WOMN
Canada
61.42%
USA
38.58%
MWMN
USA
64.54%
Other
7.19%
Other
28.27%

Sectors

WOMN
Financials
21.35%
Information Technology
19.91%
Energy
13.16%
Industrials
10.35%
Materials
9.34%
Other
8.74%
Other
17.14%
MWMN
Information Technology
35.61%
Financials
15.92%
Health Care
8.36%
Other
7.53%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
25.35%
As of May 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

WOMN
ROYAL BK CANADA
5.23%
NVIDIA
4.28%
MICROSOFT-T
3.85%
TORONTO DOMINION
3.76%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.64%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.31%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
3.20%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.13%
CA11271J1075
3.12%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.00%
MWMN
NVIDIA
9.51%
MICROSOFT-T
9.17%
APPLE
8.36%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO
2.76%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.30%
TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE
2.07%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.55%
HYDRO ONE
1.54%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.52%
S&P GLOBAL INC
1.41%

Diversification

WOMN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
36.52%
MWMN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 145 total
40.20%

Characteristics

Compare
WOMN
MWMN
ProviderBMOMackenzie Investments
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%1.29%
Meets ESG criteriaYesYes
Inception DateMay 29, 2018December 4, 2017

Frequently asked questions about WOMN and MWMN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: WOMN or MWMN?
As of May 11, 2026, WOMN has returned 3.05% year to date, while MWMN has returned 5.03%. MWMN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: WOMN or MWMN?
As of May 11, 2026, WOMN manages $8.36 M in assets, while MWMN manages $8.15 M. WOMN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are WOMN and MWMN managed?
WOMN is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. MWMN is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do WOMN and MWMN emphasize?
WOMN is most exposed to Financials, Information Technology, and Energy. MWMN is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: WOMN or MWMN?
Year to date, WOMN has seen +$0.01 M in net flows, compared with +$0.54 M for MWMN. MWMN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of WOMN and MWMN compare?
WOMN has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while MWMN has an expense ratio of 0.62%.
What are the top holdings of WOMN and MWMN?
WOMN's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and NVIDIA. MWMN's top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: WOMN or MWMN?
WOMN holds 43 securities, while MWMN holds 143. On holdings count, MWMN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about WOMN and MWMN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds