WSRD
Wealthsimple Developed Markets ex North America Socially Responsible Index ETF
Full WSRD fund page
VS
Compare Wealthsimple Developed Markets ex North America Socially Responsible Index ETF (WSRD) vs CI Invesco International Developed Multifactor Index ETF (IIMF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. WSRD provides Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare exposures, while IIMF is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, WSRD features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.39% for IIMF. Performance-wise, WSRD has returned 4.05% year-to-date with +$41 M in net flows, whereas IIMF is at 18.48% with -$9 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
WSRD
IIMF
| AuM | $1,000.49 M | $85.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.39% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.66% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WSRD | -0.73% | +1.95% | +4.05% | +6.52% | +39.84% |
IIMF | +0.31% | -2.72% | +18.48% | +27.71% | +59.57% | |
| Flows | WSRD | -$4 M | +$11 M | +$41 M | +$58 M | +$268 M |
IIMF | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$9 M | +$9 M | +$59 M |
WSRD vs IIMF exposure
Countries
WSRD
Japan
17.16%
United Kingdom
13.66%
Sweden
8.88%
Switzerland
7.93%
Germany
7.44%
Other
44.94%
IIMF
Japan
14.54%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.29%
Republic of Korea
10.64%
France
9.71%
Australia
7.77%
Other
31.49%
Sectors
WSRD
Finance
17.40%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.94%
Healthcare
14.77%
Industrials
13.61%
Consumer Cyclicals
12.16%
Technology
8.51%
Other
18.61%
IIMF
Finance
14.93%
Industrials
14.53%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
13.53%
Healthcare
12.88%
Technology
12.78%
Non-Energy Materials
7.71%
Other
23.63%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
WSRD
VERBUND AG
1.66%
Kingspan Group Plc
1.33%
Unilever Plc
1.17%
Antofagasta Plc
1.12%
Fortescue Ltd.
1.10%
Ferrari NV
1.10%
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA
1.10%
ASSA ABLOY AB
1.09%
Pearson Plc
1.06%
Isuzu Motors Ltd.
0.98%
IIMF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.47%
Novartis AG
2.97%
Roche Holding AG
2.88%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.68%
Nestlé SA
2.60%
Shell Plc
2.60%
Investor AB
1.88%
3i Group Plc
1.54%
Sanofi
1.33%
Safran SA
1.32%
Diversification
WSRD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 269 total
11.73%
IIMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 866 total
24.26%
Characteristics
Compare
WSRD
IIMF
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Wealthsimple DM ex NA Socially Responsible Factor TR Index - CAD | FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.46% | 2.46% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | June 16, 2020 | July 13, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about WSRD and IIMF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: WSRD or IIMF?
As of September 17, 2026, WSRD has returned 4.05% year to date, while IIMF has returned 18.48%. IIMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: WSRD or IIMF?
As of September 17, 2026, WSRD manages $1.00 B in assets, while IIMF manages $85.35 M. WSRD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are WSRD and IIMF managed?
WSRD is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive Wealthsimple DM ex NA Socially Responsible Factor TR Index - CAD benchmark. IIMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do WSRD and IIMF emphasize?
WSRD is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. IIMF is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: WSRD or IIMF?
Year to date, WSRD has seen +$41.35 M in net flows, compared with -$8.56 M for IIMF. WSRD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of WSRD and IIMF compare?
WSRD has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while IIMF has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of WSRD and IIMF?
WSRD's largest holdings include VERBUND AG, Kingspan Group Plc, and Unilever Plc. IIMF's top holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Roche Holding AG, and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: WSRD or IIMF?
WSRD holds 269 securities, while IIMF holds 850. On holdings count, IIMF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.