WSRD
Wealthsimple Developed Markets ex North America Socially Responsible Index ETF

Full WSRD fund page
VS
ZDM
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Full ZDM fund page

Compare Wealthsimple Developed Markets ex North America Socially Responsible Index ETF (WSRD) vs BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. WSRD provides Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials exposures, while ZDM is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, WSRD features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.2% for ZDM. Performance-wise, WSRD has returned 4.62% year-to-date with +$34 M in net flows, whereas ZDM is at 11.56% with +$287 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
WSRD
+2.66%-0.95%+4.62%+4.93%+42.40%
ZDM
-1.03%-2.59%+11.56%+13.83%+59.63%
Flows
WSRD
-$3 M-$3 M+$34 M+$45 M+$259 M
ZDM
+$25 M+$80 M+$287 M+$330 M+$916 M

WSRD vs ZDM exposure

Countries

WSRD
Japan
18.90%
United Kingdom
13.02%
Sweden
8.75%
Germany
7.94%
Switzerland
7.63%
Other
43.76%
ZDM
Japan
26.72%
United Kingdom
13.54%
Switzerland
8.86%
Germany
7.87%
France
7.73%
Australia
7.02%
Other
28.26%

Sectors

WSRD
Finance
16.63%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.14%
Industrials
14.13%
Healthcare
13.40%
Consumer Cyclicals
11.87%
Technology
10.40%
Other
19.43%
ZDM
Finance
27.21%
Industrials
16.24%
Technology
13.38%
Healthcare
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
7.69%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.68%
Other
18.66%
As of November 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

WSRD
Kingspan Group Plc
1.91%
Energix-Renewable Energies Ltd.
1.55%
Fortescue Ltd.
1.29%
Antofagasta Plc
1.26%
Fresnillo Plc
1.14%
ASSA ABLOY AB
1.09%
Kesko Oyj
0.99%
Unilever Plc
0.99%
Ferrari NV
0.91%
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
0.88%
ZDM
CA05579E1097
100.80%

Diversification

WSRD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 274 total
12.00%
ZDM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,621 total
100.80%

Characteristics

Compare
WSRD
ZDM
ProviderMackenzie InvestmentsBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Wealthsimple DM ex NA Socially Responsible Factor TR Index - CADMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Other
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.59%1.96%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateJune 16, 2020October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about WSRD and ZDM

Which ETF has performed better year to date: WSRD or ZDM?
As of November 3, 2026, WSRD has returned 4.62% year to date, while ZDM has returned 11.56%. ZDM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: WSRD or ZDM?
As of November 3, 2026, WSRD manages $994.28 M in assets, while ZDM manages $1.99 B. ZDM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are WSRD and ZDM managed?
WSRD is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive Wealthsimple DM ex NA Socially Responsible Factor TR Index - CAD benchmark. ZDM is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: WSRD or ZDM?
WSRD holds 274 securities, while ZDM holds 1. On holdings count, WSRD is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: WSRD or ZDM?
Year to date, WSRD has seen +$34.42 M in net flows, compared with +$287.20 M for ZDM. ZDM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of WSRD and ZDM compare?
WSRD has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while ZDM has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What sectors do WSRD and ZDM emphasize?
WSRD is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. ZDM is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds