VS
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGH) and RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XAGH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Sovereign, Finance, and Industrials, while RUSB.U leans towards Finance, Utilities, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XAGH features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.35% for RUSB.U. Performance-wise, XAGH has returned 2.63% year-to-date with -$60 M in net flows, whereas RUSB.U is at 0.15% with +$37 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XAGH
RUSB.U
| AuM | $308.11 M | $258.70 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.16% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XAGH | -1.43% | -2.40% | -2.63% | -2.72% | +7.08% |
RUSB.U | -0.87% | -0.58% | +0.15% | +1.17% | +15.60% | |
| Flows | XAGH | -$1 M | -$64 M | -$60 M | +$23 M | +$284 M |
RUSB.U | +$3 M | +$9 M | +$37 M | +$40 M | +$90 M |
XAGH vs RUSB.U exposure
Countries
XAGH
USA
77.34%
Other
17.21%
RUSB.U
USA
81.29%
Other
18.71%
Sectors
XAGH
Sovereign
47.52%
Other
17.21%
Finance
10.19%
Industrials
7.10%
Other
17.98%
RUSB.U
Finance
49.73%
Utilities
7.18%
Other
43.09%
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XAGH
BlackRock Cash Funds - Institutional
2.85%
USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035)
0.42%
USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030)
0.41%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
0.41%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034)
0.40%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.40%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
0.40%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035)
0.39%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
0.39%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
0.39%
RUSB.U
USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030)
2.07%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029)
1.86%
USA, Notes 4.875% 31oct2030, USD (R-2030)
1.44%
Morgan Stanley, 4.21% 20apr2028, USD (I)
1.16%
Bank of America Corporation, 4.376% 27apr2028, USD (N)
1.12%
Goldman Sachs, 6.484% 24oct2029, USD
1.12%
US48128BAV36
1.04%
Lincoln Financial Global Funding, 4.95% 21may2031, USD (2026-2)
1.02%
Morgan Stanley, 5.164% 20apr2029, USD (I)
0.97%
Veralto, 4.85% 15jan2032, USD
0.93%
Diversification
XAGH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13,243 total
6.47%
RUSB.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 171 total
12.72%
Characteristics
Compare
XAGH
RUSB.U
| Provider | iShares | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index - CAD Hedged | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.32% | 4.36% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 6, 2021 | October 19, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about XAGH and RUSB.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XAGH or RUSB.U?
As of September 14, 2026, XAGH has returned -2.63% year to date, while RUSB.U has returned 0.15%. RUSB.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XAGH or RUSB.U?
As of September 14, 2026, XAGH manages $308.11 M in assets, while RUSB.U manages $258.70 M. XAGH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XAGH and RUSB.U managed?
XAGH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. RUSB.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XAGH and RUSB.U emphasize?
XAGH is most exposed to Sovereign, Finance, and Industrials. RUSB.U is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XAGH or RUSB.U?
Year to date, XAGH has seen -$59.74 M in net flows, compared with +$36.66 M for RUSB.U. RUSB.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XAGH and RUSB.U compare?
XAGH has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while RUSB.U has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of XAGH and RUSB.U?
XAGH's largest holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Institutional and USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035). RUSB.U's top holdings include USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030), USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029), and USA, Notes 4.875% 31oct2030, USD (R-2030).
Which ETF is more diversified: XAGH or RUSB.U?
XAGH holds 10356 securities, while RUSB.U holds 171. On holdings count, XAGH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XAGH and RUSB.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.