VS
Compare iShares China Index ETF (XCH) vs Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF (QCH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCH provides Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while QCH is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.55% for QCH. Performance-wise, XCH has returned 11.08% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas QCH is at 5.17% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCH
QCH
| AuM | $170.53 M | $30.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.86% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCH | -1.83% | -9.13% | -11.08% | -15.95% | +39.02% |
QCH | -7.26% | -10.89% | -5.17% | -6.29% | +32.40% | |
| Flows | XCH | +$0 M | -$7 M | -$2 M | -$3 M | +$77 M |
QCH | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$5 M | +$5 M | +$2 M |
XCH vs QCH exposure
Countries
XCH
China
94.38%
QCH
China
100.00%
Sectors
XCH
Finance
37.91%
Technology
21.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.42%
Consumer Cyclicals
8.76%
Other
21.39%
QCH
Technology
30.16%
Finance
20.73%
Industrials
17.02%
Non-Energy Materials
9.82%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.77%
Other
13.49%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCH
US4642871846
99.95%
QCH
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
3.98%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.10%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
3.08%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.43%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.26%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.02%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
1.98%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.64%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
1.61%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.39%
Diversification
XCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
99.95%
QCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 284 total
23.49%
Characteristics
Compare
XCH
QCH
| Provider | iShares | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD | CSI 300 Index - CNY |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.87% | 1.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 21, 2010 | February 1, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about XCH and QCH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCH or QCH?
As of November 2, 2026, XCH has returned -11.08% year to date, while QCH has returned -5.17%. QCH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCH or QCH?
As of November 2, 2026, XCH manages $170.53 M in assets, while QCH manages $30.66 M. XCH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCH and QCH managed?
XCH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. QCH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the CSI 300 Index - CNY benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCH or QCH?
XCH holds 1 securities, while QCH holds 284. On holdings count, QCH is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCH or QCH?
Year to date, XCH has seen -$1.56 M in net flows, compared with +$4.57 M for QCH. QCH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCH and QCH compare?
XCH has an expense ratio of 0.86%, while QCH has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What sectors do XCH and QCH emphasize?
XCH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QCH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Recent articles about XCH and QCH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.