VS
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) and CI Digital Security ETF (CBUG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCHP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while CBUG leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.4% for CBUG. Performance-wise, XCHP has returned 80.27% year-to-date with +$200 M in net flows, whereas CBUG is at 28.59% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCHP
CBUG
| AuM | $311.28 M | $4.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.36% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCHP | -10.06% | +33.57% | +80.27% | +121.10% | - |
CBUG | +9.69% | +34.47% | +28.59% | +27.28% | +100.04% | |
| Flows | XCHP | +$60 M | +$161 M | +$200 M | +$192 M | - |
CBUG | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$2 M | -$0 M | -$15 M |
XCHP vs CBUG exposure
Countries
XCHP
USA
85.27%
Other
14.73%
CBUG
USA
85.53%
Other
14.47%
Sectors
XCHP
Technology
99.86%
CBUG
Technology
96.79%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCHP
Micron Technology, Inc.
11.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
9.48%
Broadcom Inc.
6.90%
Intel Corp.
6.20%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
6.19%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.88%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.45%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
4.35%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.55%
NXP Semiconductors NV
3.49%
CBUG
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
10.78%
Fortinet, Inc.
7.19%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
6.13%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
5.98%
Okta, Inc.
5.74%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
5.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.08%
Broadcom Inc.
4.88%
BlackBerry Ltd.
4.24%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
3.88%
Diversification
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
62.12%
CBUG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 38 total
59.31%
Characteristics
Compare
XCHP
CBUG
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD | Solactive Digital Security Index NTR - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.16% | 0.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | March 1, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about XCHP and CBUG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCHP or CBUG?
As of July 16, 2026, XCHP has returned 80.27% year to date, while CBUG has returned 28.59%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or CBUG?
As of July 16, 2026, XCHP manages $311.28 M in assets, while CBUG manages $4.05 M. XCHP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and CBUG managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. CBUG is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive Digital Security Index NTR - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and CBUG emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. CBUG is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCHP or CBUG?
Year to date, XCHP has seen +$199.66 M in net flows, compared with -$1.74 M for CBUG. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCHP and CBUG compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while CBUG has an expense ratio of 0.47%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and CBUG?
XCHP's largest holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. CBUG's top holdings include Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., and Akamai Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or CBUG?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while CBUG holds 38. On holdings count, CBUG is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCHP and CBUG
Tech ETFs Plunge Amid Nasdaq-100 and S&P500 Decline
US markets fell sharply this week, with tech ETFs leading the decline. The S&P500 and Nasdaq 100 suffered heavy losses as semiconductor stocks came under acute pressure, dragging the tech sector down.
Posted on 9/9/2024 by ETF Market Canada inTechnology
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.