VS
Compare iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) vs Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCHP provides Technology exposures, while QMVP is primarily weighted in Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.19% for QMVP. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCHP
QMVP
| AuM | $323.33 M | $353.56 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.19% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.06% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCHP | -15.96% | +35.72% | +88.81% | +130.93% | - |
QMVP | -2.29% | +18.78% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XCHP | +$48 M | +$154 M | +$197 M | +$185 M | - |
QMVP | +$32 M | +$43 M | - | - | - |
XCHP vs QMVP exposure
Countries
XCHP
USA
83.56%
Other
16.44%
QMVP
USA
99.82%
Sectors
XCHP
Technology
99.84%
QMVP
Technology
86.18%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.85%
As of July 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCHP
Micron Technology, Inc.
8.54%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.09%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.81%
Intel Corp.
6.33%
Broadcom Inc.
6.08%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.77%
KLA Corp.
5.64%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
5.22%
Lam Research Corp.
4.89%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.26%
QMVP
Tesla, Inc.
5.79%
Apple, Inc.
5.60%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.26%
Broadcom Inc.
5.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.12%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.07%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.03%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.02%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
5.00%
Microsoft Corp.
4.91%
Diversification
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
61.63%
QMVP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
51.92%
Characteristics
Compare
XCHP
QMVP
| Provider | iShares | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD | Solactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.16% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | January 20, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about XCHP and QMVP
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or QMVP?
As of July 21, 2026, XCHP manages $323.33 M in assets, while QMVP manages $353.56 M. QMVP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and QMVP managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. QMVP is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and QMVP emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. QMVP is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals.
How do the fees of XCHP and QMVP compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while QMVP has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and QMVP?
XCHP's largest holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and NVIDIA Corp.. QMVP's top holdings include Tesla, Inc., Apple, Inc., and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or QMVP?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while QMVP holds 25. On holdings count, XCHP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCHP and QMVP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.