XCHP
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF

Full XCHP fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCHP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, XCHP has returned 76.99% year-to-date with +$198 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.65% with +$209 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10-50510%Jun 17Jun 24Jul 2Jul 9Jul 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCHP
-13.08%+28.56%+76.99%+115.94%-
ZEB
+1.98%+16.51%+32.65%+67.24%+148.29%
Flows
XCHP
+$55 M+$159 M+$198 M+$190 M-
ZEB
+$972 M+$1,234 M+$209 M+$894 M-$431 M

XCHP vs ZEB exposure

Countries

XCHP
USA
83.56%
Other
16.44%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

XCHP
Technology
99.84%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCHP
Micron Technology, Inc.
8.54%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.09%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.81%
Intel Corp.
6.33%
Broadcom Inc.
6.08%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.77%
KLA Corp.
5.64%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
5.22%
Lam Research Corp.
4.89%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.26%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
61.63%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
XCHP
ZEB
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNYSE Semiconductor Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.17%2.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 6, 2023October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about XCHP and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCHP or ZEB?
As of July 17, 2026, XCHP has returned 76.99% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.65%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or ZEB?
As of July 17, 2026, XCHP manages $304.36 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.26 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and ZEB managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and ZEB emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCHP or ZEB?
Year to date, XCHP has seen +$198.39 M in net flows, compared with +$209.29 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCHP and ZEB compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and ZEB?
XCHP's largest holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and NVIDIA Corp.. ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or ZEB?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, XCHP is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCHP and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds