VS
Compare iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) vs BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCHP provides Technology exposures, while ZXLK is primarily weighted in Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLK. Performance-wise, XCHP has returned 76.99% year-to-date with +$198 M in net flows, whereas ZXLK is at 24.67% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCHP
ZXLK
| AuM | $304.36 M | $26.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCHP | -13.08% | +28.56% | +76.99% | +115.94% | - |
ZXLK | -6.09% | +16.53% | +24.67% | +37.55% | - | |
| Flows | XCHP | +$55 M | +$159 M | +$198 M | +$190 M | - |
ZXLK | -$15 M | -$14 M | +$12 M | +$14 M | - |
XCHP vs ZXLK exposure
Countries
XCHP
USA
85.27%
Other
14.73%
ZXLK
USA
98.31%
Sectors
XCHP
Technology
99.86%
ZXLK
Technology
95.86%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCHP
Micron Technology, Inc.
11.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
9.48%
Broadcom Inc.
6.90%
Intel Corp.
6.20%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
6.19%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.88%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.45%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
4.35%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.55%
NXP Semiconductors NV
3.49%
ZXLK
NVIDIA Corp.
13.07%
Apple, Inc.
11.67%
Microsoft Corp.
8.52%
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.78%
Broadcom Inc.
5.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.22%
Intel Corp.
3.34%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.95%
Lam Research Corp.
2.47%
Oracle Corp.
2.38%
Diversification
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
62.12%
ZXLK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 73 total
61.80%
Characteristics
Compare
XCHP
ZXLK
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD | S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.17% | 0.25% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XCHP and ZXLK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCHP or ZXLK?
As of July 17, 2026, XCHP has returned 76.99% year to date, while ZXLK has returned 24.67%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or ZXLK?
As of July 17, 2026, XCHP manages $304.36 M in assets, while ZXLK manages $26.76 M. XCHP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and ZXLK managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZXLK is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and ZXLK emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. ZXLK is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCHP or ZXLK?
Year to date, XCHP has seen +$198.39 M in net flows, compared with +$12.18 M for ZXLK. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCHP and ZXLK compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ZXLK has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and ZXLK?
XCHP's largest holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. ZXLK's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or ZXLK?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while ZXLK holds 73. On holdings count, ZXLK is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCHP and ZXLK
Tech ETFs Plunge Amid Nasdaq-100 and S&P500 Decline
US markets fell sharply this week, with tech ETFs leading the decline. The S&P500 and Nasdaq 100 suffered heavy losses as semiconductor stocks came under acute pressure, dragging the tech sector down.
Posted on 9/9/2024 by ETF Market Canada inTechnology
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.