XCNS
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF

Full XCNS fund page
VS
PACF
Purpose Active Conservative Fund

Full PACF fund page

iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF (XCNS) and Purpose Active Conservative Fund (PACF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCNS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Sovereign, and Technology, while PACF leans towards Finance, Sovereign, and Energy. When evaluating costs, XCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.2% for PACF. Performance-wise, XCNS has returned 6.07% year-to-date with +$117 M in net flows, whereas PACF is at 5.7% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-0.50.00.51.01.5%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCNS
+0.99%+0.07%+6.07%+6.38%+40.61%
PACF
+0.38%+0.16%+5.70%+5.68%-
Flows
XCNS
+$12 M+$30 M+$117 M+$150 M+$287 M
PACF
+$1 M+$2 M+$16 M+$13 M-

XCNS vs PACF exposure

Countries

XCNS
Canada
54.65%
USA
30.56%
Other
14.78%
PACF
Canada
37.32%
USA
24.94%
Other
16.65%
Other
21.09%

Sectors

XCNS
Finance
23.22%
Sovereign
18.62%
Technology
11.13%
Municipal
10.80%
Other
36.23%
PACF
Finance
23.72%
Other
16.65%
Sovereign
11.56%
Other
48.07%
As of October 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.36%
Apple, Inc.
1.19%
Microsoft Corp.
0.96%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.65%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1sep2030, CAD
0.58%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.57%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1dec2035, CAD
0.56%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2036, CAD
0.55%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.54%
PACF
CA74643B1031
5.25%
CA55454N1042
3.78%
CA74642E3068
3.40%
USA, Bills 0% 17sep2026, USD (182D)
1.61%
USA, Bills 0% 18mar2027, USD (364D)
1.34%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.91%
CA74642X1069
0.64%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
0.60%
Bank of Montreal
0.59%
Canada, Bonds 2.5% 1nov2027, CAD
0.51%

Diversification

XCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21,879 total
7.72%
PACF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19,058 total
18.63%

Characteristics

Compare
XCNS
PACF
ProvideriSharesPurpose Investments
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.67%3.54%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 7, 2019October 13, 2023

Frequently asked questions about XCNS and PACF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCNS or PACF?
As of October 16, 2026, XCNS has returned 6.07% year to date, while PACF has returned 5.70%. XCNS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCNS or PACF?
As of October 16, 2026, XCNS manages $443.98 M in assets, while PACF manages $78.88 M. XCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCNS and PACF managed?
XCNS is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. PACF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XCNS and PACF emphasize?
XCNS is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Technology. PACF is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCNS or PACF?
Year to date, XCNS has seen +$116.58 M in net flows, compared with +$15.66 M for PACF. XCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCNS and PACF compare?
XCNS has an expense ratio of 0.18%, while PACF has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What are the top holdings of XCNS and PACF?
XCNS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. PACF's top holdings include USA, Bills 0% 17sep2026, USD (182D) and USA, Bills 0% 18mar2027, USD (364D).
Which ETF is more diversified: XCNS or PACF?
XCNS holds 21552 securities, while PACF holds 15772. On holdings count, XCNS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCNS and PACF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds