XCNS
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF

Full XCNS fund page
VS
VCNS
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio

Full VCNS fund page

iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF (XCNS) and Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCNS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Sovereign, and Technology, while VCNS leans towards Sovereign, Finance, and Municipal. When evaluating costs, XCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.22% for VCNS. Performance-wise, XCNS has returned 5.99% year-to-date with +$101 M in net flows, whereas VCNS is at 5.5% with +$193 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.0-0.50.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCNS
-1.06%+0.38%+5.99%+10.51%+36.48%
VCNS
-1.19%-0.04%+5.50%+9.97%+36.16%
Flows
XCNS
+$10 M+$34 M+$101 M+$149 M+$270 M
VCNS
+$17 M+$73 M+$193 M+$305 M+$356 M

XCNS vs VCNS exposure

Countries

XCNS
Canada
54.21%
USA
30.16%
Other
15.62%
VCNS
Canada
46.44%
USA
28.26%
Other
25.30%

Sectors

XCNS
Finance
23.83%
Sovereign
18.32%
Technology
10.86%
Municipal
10.56%
Other
36.42%
VCNS
Sovereign
25.41%
Finance
18.86%
Municipal
11.13%
Technology
10.75%
Other
33.85%
As of September 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCNS
Apple, Inc.
1.27%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.22%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.87%
Microsoft Corp.
0.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.60%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.59%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.56%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1sep2030, CAD
0.56%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1dec2035, CAD
0.55%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2035, CAD
0.52%
VCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.17%
Apple, Inc.
1.15%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.04%
Microsoft Corp.
0.87%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.71%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.67%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.64%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1sep2030, CAD
0.57%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1dec2035, CAD
0.55%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2036, CAD
0.54%

Diversification

XCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21,952 total
7.60%
VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,981 total
7.91%

Characteristics

Compare
XCNS
VCNS
ProvideriSharesVanguard
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.60%2.49%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 7, 2019February 1, 2018

Frequently asked questions about XCNS and VCNS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCNS or VCNS?
As of September 1, 2026, XCNS has returned 5.99% year to date, while VCNS has returned 5.50%. XCNS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCNS or VCNS?
As of September 1, 2026, XCNS manages $431.06 M in assets, while VCNS manages $961.42 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCNS and VCNS managed?
XCNS is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XCNS and VCNS emphasize?
XCNS is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Technology. VCNS is most exposed to Sovereign, Finance, and Municipal.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCNS or VCNS?
Year to date, XCNS has seen +$101.45 M in net flows, compared with +$192.84 M for VCNS. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCNS and VCNS compare?
XCNS has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What are the top holdings of XCNS and VCNS?
XCNS's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. VCNS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCNS or VCNS?
XCNS holds 21780 securities, while VCNS holds 28148. On holdings count, VCNS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCNS and VCNS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds