VS
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Dividend Index ETF (SMVP.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XDG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while SMVP.U leans towards Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XDG features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.19% for SMVP.U. Performance-wise, XDG has returned 16.29% year-to-date with +$140 M in net flows, whereas SMVP.U is at 14.04% with +$76 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XDG
SMVP.U
| AuM | $796.20 M | $235.93 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.59% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XDG | -0.05% | +6.81% | +16.29% | +21.25% | +57.77% |
SMVP.U | +0.37% | +7.75% | +14.04% | +15.30% | - | |
| Flows | XDG | +$10 M | +$16 M | +$140 M | +$198 M | +$302 M |
SMVP.U | +$20 M | +$39 M | +$76 M | +$187 M | - |
XDG vs SMVP.U exposure
Countries
XDG
USA
53.58%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
39.23%
SMVP.U
USA
89.11%
Other
10.89%
Sectors
XDG
Healthcare
21.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.76%
Finance
14.38%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.05%
Other
32.03%
SMVP.U
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
19.39%
Healthcare
17.30%
Industrials
17.19%
Non-Energy Materials
10.79%
Finance
8.61%
Technology
7.84%
Other
18.87%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XDG
US30233Q1085
3.20%
Johnson & Johnson
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.23%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.88%
Chevron Corp.
1.74%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.68%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.64%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
Roche Holding AG
1.51%
SMVP.U
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.46%
Target Corp.
3.23%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.19%
Waters Corp.
3.11%
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.01%
Aflac, Inc.
3.01%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.99%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
2.95%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
2.94%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
2.93%
Diversification
XDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 378 total
20.09%
SMVP.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 37 total
30.81%
Characteristics
Compare
XDG
SMVP.U
| Provider | iShares | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD | Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.46% | 2.11% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 7, 2017 | June 13, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XDG and SMVP.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XDG or SMVP.U?
As of September 2, 2026, XDG has returned 16.29% year to date, while SMVP.U has returned 14.04%. XDG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDG or SMVP.U?
As of September 2, 2026, XDG manages $796.20 M in assets, while SMVP.U manages $235.93 M. XDG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDG and SMVP.U managed?
XDG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD benchmark. SMVP.U is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XDG and SMVP.U emphasize?
XDG is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. SMVP.U is most exposed to Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XDG or SMVP.U?
Year to date, XDG has seen +$139.89 M in net flows, compared with +$76.25 M for SMVP.U. XDG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XDG and SMVP.U compare?
XDG has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while SMVP.U has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of XDG and SMVP.U?
XDG's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie, Inc.. SMVP.U's top holdings include Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Target Corp., and Eli Lilly & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDG or SMVP.U?
XDG holds 372 securities, while SMVP.U holds 36. On holdings count, XDG is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.