VS
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG) and TD Q Global Dividend ETF (TQGD) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XDG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while TQGD leans towards Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XDG features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.4% for TQGD. Performance-wise, XDG has returned 16.44% year-to-date with +$140 M in net flows, whereas TQGD is at 21.25% with +$259 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XDG
TQGD
| AuM | $797.22 M | $933.94 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XDG | +0.07% | +6.87% | +16.44% | +21.78% | +57.97% |
TQGD | +3.62% | +7.29% | +21.25% | +26.99% | +79.58% | |
| Flows | XDG | +$10 M | +$16 M | +$140 M | +$198 M | +$302 M |
TQGD | +$31 M | +$84 M | +$259 M | +$337 M | +$626 M |
XDG vs TQGD exposure
Countries
XDG
USA
53.58%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
39.23%
TQGD
USA
62.17%
Japan
8.10%
Other
29.72%
Sectors
XDG
Healthcare
21.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.76%
Finance
14.38%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.05%
Other
32.03%
TQGD
Technology
30.56%
Finance
21.44%
Industrials
9.19%
Healthcare
8.09%
Other
30.72%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XDG
US30233Q1085
3.20%
Johnson & Johnson
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.23%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.88%
Chevron Corp.
1.74%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.68%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.64%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
Roche Holding AG
1.51%
TQGD
NVIDIA Corp.
4.68%
Apple, Inc.
4.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.71%
HP, Inc.
1.85%
Amcor Plc
1.77%
Best Buy Co., Inc.
1.71%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.70%
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
1.67%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.64%
Pfizer Inc.
1.62%
Diversification
XDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 378 total
20.09%
TQGD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 200 total
23.69%
Characteristics
Compare
XDG
TQGD
| Provider | iShares | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.46% | 2.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 7, 2017 | November 26, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XDG and TQGD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XDG or TQGD?
As of September 3, 2026, XDG has returned 16.44% year to date, while TQGD has returned 21.25%. TQGD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDG or TQGD?
As of September 3, 2026, XDG manages $797.22 M in assets, while TQGD manages $933.94 M. TQGD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDG and TQGD managed?
XDG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD benchmark. TQGD is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XDG and TQGD emphasize?
XDG is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. TQGD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XDG or TQGD?
Year to date, XDG has seen +$139.89 M in net flows, compared with +$258.77 M for TQGD. TQGD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XDG and TQGD compare?
XDG has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while TQGD has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of XDG and TQGD?
XDG's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie, Inc.. TQGD's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDG or TQGD?
XDG holds 372 securities, while TQGD holds 198. On holdings count, XDG is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.