XDG
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF

Full XDG fund page
VS
XDU
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

Full XDU fund page

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XDG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while XDU leans towards Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XDG features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.14% for XDU. Performance-wise, XDG has returned 16.29% year-to-date with +$140 M in net flows, whereas XDU is at 18.07% with +$55 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.0-0.50.00.51.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XDG
-0.05%+6.81%+16.29%+21.25%+57.77%
XDU
-0.93%+6.47%+18.07%+20.24%+53.04%
Flows
XDG
+$10 M+$16 M+$140 M+$198 M+$302 M
XDU
-$8 M+$26 M+$55 M+$56 M+$57 M

XDG vs XDU exposure

Countries

XDG
USA
53.58%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
39.23%
XDU
USA
90.02%
Other
9.98%

Sectors

XDG
Healthcare
21.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.76%
Finance
14.38%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.05%
Other
32.03%
XDU
Healthcare
19.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.47%
Industrials
12.76%
Technology
11.22%
Finance
10.08%
Other
32.23%
As of September 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XDG
US30233Q1085
3.20%
Johnson & Johnson
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.23%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.88%
Chevron Corp.
1.74%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.68%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.64%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
Roche Holding AG
1.51%
XDU
Johnson & Johnson
4.66%
US30233Q1085
4.63%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.39%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.89%
Chevron Corp.
2.68%
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.59%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.53%
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.51%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.43%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.26%

Diversification

XDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 378 total
20.09%
XDU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 161 total
30.56%

Characteristics

Compare
XDG
XDU
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USDMSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index - USD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.46%2.62%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 7, 2017June 7, 2017

Frequently asked questions about XDG and XDU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XDG or XDU?
As of September 1, 2026, XDG has returned 16.29% year to date, while XDU has returned 18.07%. XDU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDG or XDU?
As of September 1, 2026, XDG manages $796.20 M in assets, while XDU manages $328.00 M. XDG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDG and XDU managed?
XDG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD benchmark. XDU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XDG and XDU emphasize?
XDG is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. XDU is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XDG or XDU?
Year to date, XDG has seen +$139.89 M in net flows, compared with +$54.85 M for XDU. XDG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XDG and XDU compare?
XDG has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while XDU has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What are the top holdings of XDG and XDU?
XDG's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie, Inc.. XDU's top holdings include Johnson & Johnson and Cisco Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDG or XDU?
XDG holds 372 securities, while XDU holds 157. On holdings count, XDG is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds