XDGH
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF

Full XDGH fund page
VS
VUDV
Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF

Full VUDV fund page

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDGH) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XDGH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while VUDV leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XDGH features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.28% for VUDV. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XDGH
+0.50%+6.56%+14.21%+19.73%+48.71%
VUDV
-2.27%+2.44%---
Flows
XDGH
+$5 M+$9 M+$40 M+$57 M+$91 M
VUDV
+$4 M+$29 M---

XDGH vs VUDV exposure

Countries

XDGH
USA
53.58%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
39.23%
VUDV
USA
91.60%
Other
8.40%

Sectors

XDGH
Healthcare
21.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.76%
Finance
14.38%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.05%
Other
32.03%
VUDV
Finance
21.70%
Technology
16.57%
Healthcare
12.70%
Industrials
10.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Other
30.09%
As of September 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XDGH
US30233Q1085
3.20%
Johnson & Johnson
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.23%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.88%
Chevron Corp.
1.74%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.68%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.64%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
Roche Holding AG
1.51%
VUDV
Broadcom Inc.
7.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.82%
US30233Q1085
2.63%
Johnson & Johnson
2.51%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.86%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.80%
Bank of America Corp.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.52%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.50%
Chevron Corp.
1.48%

Diversification

XDGH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 378 total
20.09%
VUDV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 604 total
26.13%

Characteristics

Compare
XDGH
VUDV
ProvideriSharesVanguard
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI World High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Total Return Index - CADFTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index NTR - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.65%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 13, 2017March 23, 2026

Frequently asked questions about XDGH and VUDV

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDGH or VUDV?
As of September 1, 2026, XDGH manages $185.35 M in assets, while VUDV manages $63.70 M. XDGH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDGH and VUDV managed?
XDGH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VUDV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XDGH and VUDV emphasize?
XDGH is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. VUDV is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of XDGH and VUDV compare?
XDGH has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while VUDV has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XDGH and VUDV?
XDGH's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie, Inc.. VUDV's top holdings include Broadcom Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDGH or VUDV?
XDGH holds 372 securities, while VUDV holds 596. On holdings count, VUDV is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds