VS
Compare iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDGH) vs iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XDGH and XDG provide the same top sector exposures: Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. When evaluating costs, XDGH features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.2% for XDG. Performance-wise, XDGH has returned 14.21% year-to-date with +$40 M in net flows, whereas XDG is at 16.29% with +$140 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XDGH
XDG
| AuM | $185.35 M | $796.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.02% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XDGH | +0.50% | +6.56% | +14.21% | +19.73% | +48.71% |
XDG | -0.05% | +6.81% | +16.29% | +21.25% | +57.77% | |
| Flows | XDGH | +$5 M | +$9 M | +$40 M | +$57 M | +$91 M |
XDG | +$10 M | +$16 M | +$140 M | +$198 M | +$302 M |
XDGH vs XDG exposure
Countries
XDGH
USA
53.58%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
39.23%
XDG
USA
53.58%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
39.23%
Sectors
XDGH
Healthcare
21.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.76%
Finance
14.38%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.05%
Other
32.03%
XDG
Healthcare
21.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.76%
Finance
14.38%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.05%
Other
32.03%
As of September 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XDGH
US30233Q1085
3.20%
Johnson & Johnson
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.23%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.88%
Chevron Corp.
1.74%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.68%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.64%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
Roche Holding AG
1.51%
XDG
US30233Q1085
3.20%
Johnson & Johnson
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.23%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.88%
Chevron Corp.
1.74%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.68%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.64%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
Roche Holding AG
1.51%
Diversification
XDGH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 378 total
20.09%
XDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 378 total
20.09%
Characteristics
Compare
XDGH
XDG
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI World High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.65% | 2.46% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 13, 2017 | June 7, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about XDGH and XDG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XDGH or XDG?
As of September 1, 2026, XDGH has returned 14.21% year to date, while XDG has returned 16.29%. XDG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDGH or XDG?
As of September 1, 2026, XDGH manages $185.35 M in assets, while XDG manages $796.20 M. XDG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDGH and XDG managed?
XDGH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XDG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XDGH and XDG emphasize?
XDGH is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. XDG is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XDGH or XDG?
Year to date, XDGH has seen +$39.58 M in net flows, compared with +$139.89 M for XDG. XDG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XDGH and XDG compare?
XDGH has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while XDG has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of XDGH and XDG?
XDGH's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie, Inc.. XDG's top holdings include Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDGH or XDG?
XDGH holds 372 securities, while XDG holds 372. On holdings count, XDGH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.