XDUH
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

Full XDUH fund page
VS
VUDV
Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF

Full VUDV fund page

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDUH) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XDUH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials, while VUDV leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XDUH features a management fee (MER) of 0.14%, compared to 0.28% for VUDV. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XDUH
-0.09%+5.50%+14.69%+17.35%+42.55%
VUDV
-2.27%+2.44%---
Flows
XDUH
-$14 M+$19 M+$20 M+$27 M+$20 M
VUDV
+$4 M+$29 M---

XDUH vs VUDV exposure

Countries

XDUH
USA
90.02%
Other
9.98%
VUDV
USA
91.60%
Other
8.40%

Sectors

XDUH
Healthcare
19.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.47%
Industrials
12.76%
Technology
11.22%
Finance
10.08%
Other
32.23%
VUDV
Finance
21.70%
Technology
16.57%
Healthcare
12.70%
Industrials
10.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Other
30.09%
As of September 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XDUH
Johnson & Johnson
4.66%
US30233Q1085
4.63%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.39%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.89%
Chevron Corp.
2.68%
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.59%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.53%
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.51%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.43%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.26%
VUDV
Broadcom Inc.
7.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.82%
US30233Q1085
2.63%
Johnson & Johnson
2.51%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.86%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.80%
Bank of America Corp.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.52%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.50%
Chevron Corp.
1.48%

Diversification

XDUH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 161 total
30.56%
VUDV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 604 total
26.13%

Characteristics

Compare
XDUH
VUDV
ProvideriSharesVanguard
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CADFTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index NTR - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.16%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 13, 2017March 23, 2026

Frequently asked questions about XDUH and VUDV

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDUH or VUDV?
As of September 1, 2026, XDUH manages $121.86 M in assets, while VUDV manages $63.70 M. XDUH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDUH and VUDV managed?
XDUH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VUDV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XDUH and VUDV emphasize?
XDUH is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. VUDV is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of XDUH and VUDV compare?
XDUH has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while VUDV has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XDUH and VUDV?
XDUH's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and Cisco Systems, Inc.. VUDV's top holdings include Broadcom Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDUH or VUDV?
XDUH holds 157 securities, while VUDV holds 596. On holdings count, VUDV is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds