VS
Compare iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDUH) vs BMO US Dividend Growth ETF (ZBDU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XDUH provides Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials exposures, while ZBDU is primarily weighted in Finance, Healthcare, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XDUH features a management fee (MER) of 0.14%, compared to 0.51% for ZBDU. Performance-wise, XDUH has returned 15.19% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas ZBDU is at 14.09% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XDUH
ZBDU
| AuM | $122.38 M | $7.51 M |
| Management Fees | 0.14% | 0.51% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.75% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XDUH | +0.34% | +5.15% | +15.19% | +17.86% | +44.63% |
ZBDU | -1.38% | +5.48% | +14.09% | +18.94% | - | |
| Flows | XDUH | -$14 M | +$20 M | +$20 M | +$27 M | +$20 M |
ZBDU | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | - |
XDUH vs ZBDU exposure
Countries
XDUH
USA
90.02%
Other
9.98%
ZBDU
USA
95.89%
Sectors
XDUH
Healthcare
19.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.47%
Industrials
12.76%
Technology
11.22%
Finance
10.08%
Other
32.23%
ZBDU
Finance
30.03%
Healthcare
19.53%
Technology
18.61%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.29%
Other
23.55%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XDUH
Johnson & Johnson
4.66%
US30233Q1085
4.63%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.39%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.89%
Chevron Corp.
2.68%
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.59%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.53%
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.51%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.43%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.26%
ZBDU
Bank of America Corp.
4.28%
Johnson & Johnson
4.01%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.92%
Morgan Stanley
3.61%
Apple, Inc.
3.46%
RTX Corp.
3.29%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.29%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
3.19%
AbbVie, Inc.
3.13%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
3.12%
Diversification
XDUH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 161 total
30.56%
ZBDU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
35.29%
Characteristics
Compare
XDUH
ZBDU
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.15% | 2.24% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 13, 2017 | May 21, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XDUH and ZBDU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XDUH or ZBDU?
As of September 2, 2026, XDUH has returned 15.19% year to date, while ZBDU has returned 14.09%. XDUH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XDUH or ZBDU?
As of September 2, 2026, XDUH manages $122.38 M in assets, while ZBDU manages $7.51 M. XDUH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XDUH and ZBDU managed?
XDUH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA High Dividend Yield 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZBDU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XDUH and ZBDU emphasize?
XDUH is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. ZBDU is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XDUH or ZBDU?
Year to date, XDUH has seen +$20.16 M in net flows, compared with +$1.77 M for ZBDU. XDUH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XDUH and ZBDU compare?
XDUH has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while ZBDU has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
What are the top holdings of XDUH and ZBDU?
XDUH's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson and Cisco Systems, Inc.. ZBDU's top holdings include Bank of America Corp., Johnson & Johnson, and Cisco Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XDUH or ZBDU?
XDUH holds 157 securities, while ZBDU holds 47. On holdings count, XDUH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.