XEF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF

Full XEF fund page
VS
XFH
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF

Full XFH fund page

Compare iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF) vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XFH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEF and XFH provide the same top sector exposures: Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XEF features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.2% for XFH. Performance-wise, XEF has returned 10.69% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas XFH is at 9.72% with +$395 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%May 4May 11May 19May 26Jun 2

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEF
+5.46%+6.26%+10.69%+23.31%+64.80%
XFH
+5.09%+4.05%+9.72%+23.38%+59.64%
Flows
XEF
+$464 M+$1,546 M+$3,196 M+$6,305 M+$10,148 M
XFH
+$50 M+$192 M+$395 M+$802 M+$1,302 M

XEF vs XFH exposure

Countries

XEF
Japan
24.72%
United Kingdom
13.85%
Switzerland
8.56%
France
8.29%
Germany
8.26%
Australia
7.14%
Other
29.19%
XFH
Japan
24.72%
United Kingdom
13.85%
Switzerland
8.56%
France
8.29%
Germany
8.26%
Australia
7.14%
Other
29.19%

Sectors

XEF
Financials
21.98%
Industrials
19.21%
Information Technology
9.35%
Consumer Discretionary
8.38%
Health Care
7.01%
Other
34.06%
XFH
Financials
21.98%
Industrials
19.21%
Information Technology
9.35%
Consumer Discretionary
8.38%
Health Care
7.01%
Other
34.06%
As of June 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEF
ASML HOLDING
2.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.24%
ASTRAZENECA
1.17%
CH1499059983
1.13%
NOVARTIS
1.11%
NESTLE SA
1.03%
SHELL PLC
1.02%
SIEMENS
0.89%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.83%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.80%
XFH
ASML HOLDING
2.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.24%
ASTRAZENECA
1.17%
CH1499059983
1.13%
NOVARTIS
1.11%
NESTLE SA
1.03%
SHELL PLC
1.02%
SIEMENS
0.89%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.83%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.80%

Diversification

XEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,646 total
11.43%
XFH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,646 total
11.43%

Characteristics

Compare
XEF
XFH
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CADMSCI EAFE IMI 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.21%1.96%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 10, 2013February 10, 2015

Frequently asked questions about XEF and XFH

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEF or XFH?
As of June 4, 2026, XEF has returned 10.69% year to date, while XFH has returned 9.72%. XEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEF or XFH?
As of June 4, 2026, XEF manages $21.58 B in assets, while XFH manages $3.02 B. XEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEF and XFH managed?
XEF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XFH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEF and XFH emphasize?
XEF is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. XFH is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEF or XFH?
Year to date, XEF has seen +$3,196.21 M in net flows, compared with +$394.90 M for XFH. XEF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEF and XFH compare?
XEF has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while XFH has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of XEF and XFH?
XEF's largest holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS. XFH's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEF or XFH?
XEF holds 2464 securities, while XFH holds 2464. On holdings count, XEF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEF and XFH

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds