XEG
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Full XEG fund page
VS
CUTE
Evolve Canadian Utilities Yield Fund ETF

Full CUTE fund page

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Yield Fund ETF (CUTE) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Energy, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials, while CUTE leans towards Energy, Utilities, and Telecommunications. When evaluating costs, XEG features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.6% for CUTE. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEG
+6.19%+9.24%+52.14%+64.38%+88.20%
CUTE
-3.73%----
Flows
XEG
+$5 M-$144 M+$58 M+$161 M-$378 M
CUTE
+$0 M----

XEG vs CUTE exposure

Countries

XEG
Canada
99.97%
CUTE
Canada
98.62%

Sectors

XEG
Energy
95.44%
CUTE
Energy
42.34%
Utilities
30.35%
Telecommunications
25.92%
As of September 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEG
Suncor Energy, Inc.
25.76%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
25.07%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
13.38%
Imperial Oil Ltd.
6.32%
Tourmaline Oil Corp.
5.36%
Whitecap Resources, Inc.
4.66%
ARC Resources Ltd.
4.36%
PrairieSky Royalty Ltd.
1.89%
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
1.49%
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
1.22%
CUTE
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
11.06%
AltaGas Ltd.
10.77%
TC Energy Corp.
10.40%
Emera, Inc.
10.33%
Fortis, Inc.
10.22%
Enbridge, Inc.
10.12%
Hydro One Ltd.
9.80%
Rogers Communications, Inc.
9.40%
BCE, Inc.
9.02%
TELUS Corp.
7.50%

Diversification

XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 27 total
89.50%
CUTE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
98.62%

Characteristics

Compare
XEG
CUTE
ProvideriSharesEvolve ETFs
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.42%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 19, 2001July 13, 2026

Frequently asked questions about XEG and CUTE

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEG or CUTE?
As of September 11, 2026, XEG manages $2.43 B in assets, while CUTE manages $1.83 M. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEG and CUTE managed?
XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark. CUTE is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XEG and CUTE emphasize?
XEG is most exposed to Energy, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials. CUTE is most exposed to Energy, Utilities, and Telecommunications.
How do the fees of XEG and CUTE compare?
XEG has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while CUTE has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of XEG and CUTE?
XEG's largest holdings include Suncor Energy, Inc., Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., and Cenovus Energy, Inc.. CUTE's top holdings include Pembina Pipeline Corp., AltaGas Ltd., and TC Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XEG or CUTE?
XEG holds 27 securities, while CUTE holds 10. On holdings count, XEG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEG and CUTE

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds