VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEMB
-----
ZUT
+3.52%+13.25%+15.60%+31.37%+38.85%
Flows
XEMB
-----
ZUT
+$8 M-$44 M-$60 M+$129 M+$256 M

XEMB vs ZUT exposure

Countries

XEMB
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

XEMB
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEMB
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
XEMB
ZUT
Provider-BMO
Management-Passively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset Class-Equity
Dividend Policy-Distributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.92%
Meets ESG criteria-No
Inception Date-January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about XEMB and ZUT

Recent articles about XEMB and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds