XEXP
iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF

Full XEXP fund page
VS
ESGG
BMO MSCI World ESG Leaders Index ETF

Full ESGG fund page

iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP) and BMO MSCI World ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEXP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials, while ESGG leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XEXP features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.25% for ESGG. Performance-wise, XEXP has returned 18.55% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas ESGG is at 13.68% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEXP
-1.84%-2.55%+18.55%+30.77%+62.84%
ESGG
-1.94%+2.73%+13.68%+22.71%+73.23%
Flows
XEXP
+$0 M+$2 M+$3 M+$8 M+$22 M
ESGG
+$0 M+$0 M-$0 M+$3 M+$9 M

XEXP vs ESGG exposure

Countries

XEXP
USA
68.54%
Other
31.46%
ESGG
USA
70.28%
Other
29.72%

Sectors

XEXP
Technology
46.39%
Healthcare
28.64%
Industrials
9.29%
Other
15.68%
ESGG
Technology
36.78%
Finance
18.19%
Healthcare
10.13%
Industrials
9.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.06%
Other
18.39%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEXP
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.13%
Microsoft Corp.
3.96%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.93%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.84%
Johnson & Johnson
3.43%
Tesla, Inc.
3.10%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.01%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.76%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.71%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.55%
ESGG
NVIDIA Corp.
9.74%
Microsoft Corp.
6.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.01%
Tesla, Inc.
1.88%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.71%
ASML Holding NV
1.35%
Johnson & Johnson
1.33%
Visa, Inc.
1.33%

Diversification

XEXP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 194 total
33.42%
ESGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 654 total
33.80%

Characteristics

Compare
XEXP
ESGG
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMorningstar Exponential Technologies Index NR - CADMSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.76%0.86%
Meets ESG criteriaNoYes
Inception DateApril 26, 2022January 27, 2020

Frequently asked questions about XEXP and ESGG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEXP or ESGG?
As of September 2, 2026, XEXP has returned 18.55% year to date, while ESGG has returned 13.68%. XEXP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEXP or ESGG?
As of September 2, 2026, XEXP manages $41.66 M in assets, while ESGG manages $58.57 M. ESGG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEXP and ESGG managed?
XEXP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index NR - CAD benchmark. ESGG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEXP and ESGG emphasize?
XEXP is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. ESGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEXP or ESGG?
Year to date, XEXP has seen +$3.38 M in net flows, compared with -$0.07 M for ESGG. XEXP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEXP and ESGG compare?
XEXP has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while ESGG has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XEXP and ESGG?
XEXP's largest holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Microsoft Corp., and Texas Instruments Incorporated. ESGG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XEXP or ESGG?
XEXP holds 194 securities, while ESGG holds 649. On holdings count, ESGG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEXP and ESGG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds