VS
Compare iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP) vs Manulife Global Edge ETF (GEDG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEXP provides Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while GEDG is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XEXP features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.5% for GEDG. Performance-wise, XEXP has returned 18.55% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas GEDG is at 7.96% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEXP
GEDG
| AuM | $41.66 M | $23.32 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.44% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.65% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEXP | -1.84% | -2.55% | +18.55% | +30.77% | +62.84% |
GEDG | -3.31% | -0.18% | +7.96% | - | - | |
| Flows | XEXP | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$8 M | +$22 M |
GEDG | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$12 M | - | - |
XEXP vs GEDG exposure
Countries
XEXP
USA
68.54%
Other
31.46%
GEDG
USA
62.60%
Other
37.40%
Sectors
XEXP
Technology
46.39%
Healthcare
28.64%
Industrials
9.29%
Other
15.68%
GEDG
Technology
38.66%
Finance
15.63%
Healthcare
10.92%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.52%
Industrials
9.70%
Other
14.56%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEXP
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.13%
Microsoft Corp.
3.96%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.93%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.84%
Johnson & Johnson
3.43%
Tesla, Inc.
3.10%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.01%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.76%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.71%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.55%
GEDG
NVIDIA Corp.
5.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.11%
Microsoft Corp.
4.67%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.34%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.60%
Apple, Inc.
3.10%
Broadcom Inc.
3.02%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.92%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.84%
Visa, Inc.
2.15%
Diversification
XEXP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 194 total
33.42%
GEDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
37.48%
Characteristics
Compare
XEXP
GEDG
| Provider | iShares | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index NR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.76% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 26, 2022 | November 24, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XEXP and GEDG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEXP or GEDG?
As of September 2, 2026, XEXP has returned 18.55% year to date, while GEDG has returned 7.96%. XEXP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEXP or GEDG?
As of September 2, 2026, XEXP manages $41.66 M in assets, while GEDG manages $23.32 M. XEXP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEXP and GEDG managed?
XEXP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index NR - CAD benchmark. GEDG is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XEXP and GEDG emphasize?
XEXP is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. GEDG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEXP or GEDG?
Year to date, XEXP has seen +$3.38 M in net flows, compared with +$11.77 M for GEDG. GEDG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEXP and GEDG compare?
XEXP has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while GEDG has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of XEXP and GEDG?
XEXP's largest holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Microsoft Corp., and Texas Instruments Incorporated. GEDG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XEXP or GEDG?
XEXP holds 194 securities, while GEDG holds 60. On holdings count, XEXP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XEXP and GEDG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.