VS
Compare iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP) vs AGF Systematic Global ESG Factors ETF (QEF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEXP provides Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while QEF is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XEXP features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.45% for QEF. Performance-wise, XEXP has returned 18.55% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas QEF is at 11.82% with -$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEXP
QEF
| AuM | $41.66 M | $114.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.44% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.65% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEXP | -1.84% | -2.55% | +18.55% | +30.77% | +62.84% |
QEF | -2.26% | +0.41% | +11.82% | +20.56% | +62.99% | |
| Flows | XEXP | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$8 M | +$22 M |
QEF | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$6 M | -$12 M | -$44 M |
XEXP vs QEF exposure
Countries
XEXP
USA
68.54%
Other
31.46%
QEF
USA
60.36%
Other
39.64%
Sectors
XEXP
Technology
46.39%
Healthcare
28.64%
Industrials
9.29%
Other
15.68%
QEF
Technology
35.08%
Finance
23.57%
Industrials
8.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.62%
Healthcare
7.35%
Other
18.05%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEXP
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.13%
Microsoft Corp.
3.96%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.93%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.84%
Johnson & Johnson
3.43%
Tesla, Inc.
3.10%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.01%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.76%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.71%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.55%
QEF
Apple, Inc.
5.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.32%
Microsoft Corp.
3.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.65%
Broadcom Inc.
2.59%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.18%
Allianz SE
1.62%
Rio Tinto Plc
1.60%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.53%
Diversification
XEXP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 194 total
33.42%
QEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 129 total
28.62%
Characteristics
Compare
XEXP
QEF
| Provider | iShares | AGF |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index NR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.76% | 1.15% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | April 26, 2022 | February 12, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about XEXP and QEF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEXP or QEF?
As of September 2, 2026, XEXP has returned 18.55% year to date, while QEF has returned 11.82%. XEXP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEXP or QEF?
As of September 2, 2026, XEXP manages $41.66 M in assets, while QEF manages $114.78 M. QEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEXP and QEF managed?
XEXP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index NR - CAD benchmark. QEF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XEXP and QEF emphasize?
XEXP is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. QEF is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEXP or QEF?
Year to date, XEXP has seen +$3.38 M in net flows, compared with -$5.72 M for QEF. XEXP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEXP and QEF compare?
XEXP has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while QEF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of XEXP and QEF?
XEXP's largest holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Microsoft Corp., and Texas Instruments Incorporated. QEF's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XEXP or QEF?
XEXP holds 194 securities, while QEF holds 127. On holdings count, XEXP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XEXP and QEF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.