XFN
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF

Full XFN fund page
VS
ZWB
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF

Full ZWB fund page

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XFN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, while ZWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, XFN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, XFN has returned 20.16% year-to-date with -$85 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 24.72% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XFN
+9.66%+22.56%+20.16%+51.40%+130.64%
ZWB
+9.60%+23.08%+24.72%+59.92%+110.87%
Flows
XFN
-$95 M-$129 M-$85 M-$106 M-$388 M
ZWB
-$16 M-$9 M+$10 M-$7 M-$217 M

XFN vs ZWB exposure

Countries

XFN
Canada
99.71%
ZWB
Canada
100.25%

Sectors

XFN
Financials
89.78%
Other
10.22%
ZWB
Financials
100.25%
As of June 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XFN
ROYAL BK CANADA
21.23%
TORONTO DOMINION
15.27%
BANK OF MONTREAL
9.08%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
8.75%
CA11271J1075
8.41%
BNS
8.10%
MANULIFE-S
5.57%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
4.95%
SUN LIFE FINL
3.37%
FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS
3.01%
ZWB
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.03%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.97%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.92%
BNS
16.47%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.44%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.43%

Diversification

XFN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
87.74%
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.25%

Characteristics

Compare
XFN
ZWB
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Capped Financials Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.03%4.68%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 23, 2001January 28, 2011

Frequently asked questions about XFN and ZWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XFN or ZWB?
As of June 17, 2026, XFN has returned 20.16% year to date, while ZWB has returned 24.72%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XFN or ZWB?
As of June 17, 2026, XFN manages $2.27 B in assets, while ZWB manages $4.64 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XFN and ZWB managed?
XFN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XFN and ZWB emphasize?
XFN is most exposed to Financials. ZWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XFN or ZWB?
Year to date, XFN has seen -$84.94 M in net flows, compared with +$9.70 M for ZWB. ZWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XFN and ZWB compare?
XFN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of XFN and ZWB?
XFN's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION. ZWB's top holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: XFN or ZWB?
XFN holds 23 securities, while ZWB holds 6. On holdings count, XFN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XFN and ZWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds