VS
Compare iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (XGI) vs Evolve Global Defense & Aerospace Index ETF (CAMO) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XGI provides Industrials, Business Services, and Technology exposures, while CAMO is primarily weighted in Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, XGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 0.6% for CAMO. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XGI
CAMO
| AuM | $160.05 M | $2.58 M |
| Management Fees | 0.63% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.67% | 0.60% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.76% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XGI | -1.17% | -3.99% | +9.08% | +10.45% | +66.61% |
CAMO | -6.43% | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XGI | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$12 M | +$23 M | +$49 M |
CAMO | +$1 M | - | - | - | - |
XGI vs CAMO exposure
Countries
XGI
USA
50.78%
Japan
14.10%
Other
35.12%
CAMO
USA
23.67%
United Kingdom
16.52%
France
13.09%
Germany
12.51%
Netherlands
7.21%
Republic of Korea
7.10%
Other
19.90%
Sectors
XGI
Industrials
83.38%
Other
16.62%
CAMO
Industrials
96.53%
As of October 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XGI
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.63%
GE Aerospace
3.46%
RTX Corp.
2.76%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.38%
Siemens AG
2.36%
Schneider Electric SE
1.83%
Union Pacific Corp.
1.76%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.72%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.66%
Deere & Co.
1.62%
CAMO
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
7.52%
Safran SA
7.38%
BAE Systems Plc
7.28%
Rheinmetall AG
7.26%
Airbus SE
7.21%
GE Aerospace
5.91%
Saab AB
4.75%
RTX Corp.
4.65%
Thales SA
4.61%
Leonardo SpA
4.49%
Diversification
XGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 218 total
23.18%
CAMO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 45 total
61.07%
Characteristics
Compare
XGI
CAMO
| Provider | iShares | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Global Leaders Defense & Aerospace Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.29% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 26, 2013 | August 19, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about XGI and CAMO
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XGI or CAMO?
As of October 8, 2026, XGI manages $160.05 M in assets, while CAMO manages $2.58 M. XGI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XGI and CAMO managed?
XGI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CAMO is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Global Leaders Defense & Aerospace Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XGI and CAMO emphasize?
XGI is most exposed to Industrials, Business Services, and Technology. CAMO is most exposed to Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals, and Non-Energy Materials.
How do the fees of XGI and CAMO compare?
XGI has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while CAMO has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of XGI and CAMO?
XGI's largest holdings include Caterpillar, Inc., GE Aerospace, and RTX Corp.. CAMO's top holdings include Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, Safran SA, and BAE Systems Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: XGI or CAMO?
XGI holds 214 securities, while CAMO holds 45. On holdings count, XGI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.