VS
iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (XGI) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XGI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials and Information Technology, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, XGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, XGI has returned 10.86% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.43% with -$76 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XGI
ZUT
| AuM | $161.56 M | $893.16 M |
| Management Fees | 0.63% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.97% | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XGI | -0.92% | +2.49% | +10.86% | +21.18% | +67.77% |
ZUT | +3.72% | +9.48% | +20.43% | +29.41% | +47.71% | |
| Flows | XGI | +$5 M | -$3 M | +$10 M | +$18 M | +$50 M |
ZUT | -$15 M | +$4 M | -$76 M | +$122 M | +$233 M |
XGI vs ZUT exposure
Countries
XGI
USA
51.03%
Japan
13.80%
Other
35.17%
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
Sectors
XGI
Industrials
91.68%
Other
8.32%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XGI
CATERPILLAR
4.15%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
3.05%
US36828A1016
2.93%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
2.37%
SIEMENS
2.19%
BOEING U
1.80%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.71%
EATON CORP PLC
1.69%
UNION PACIFIC U
1.60%
ABB
1.56%
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
Diversification
XGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 213 total
23.05%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
Characteristics
Compare
XGI
ZUT
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.40% | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 26, 2013 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about XGI and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XGI or ZUT?
As of June 11, 2026, XGI has returned 10.86% year to date, while ZUT has returned 20.43%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XGI or ZUT?
As of June 11, 2026, XGI manages $161.56 M in assets, while ZUT manages $893.16 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XGI and ZUT managed?
XGI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XGI and ZUT emphasize?
XGI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XGI or ZUT?
Year to date, XGI has seen +$10.02 M in net flows, compared with -$76.24 M for ZUT. XGI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XGI and ZUT compare?
XGI has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XGI and ZUT?
XGI's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XGI or ZUT?
XGI holds 197 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, XGI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XGI and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.