XGRO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Full XGRO fund page
VS
XEF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF

Full XEF fund page

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XGRO focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while XEF leans towards Financials, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, XGRO features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.2% for XEF. Performance-wise, XGRO has returned 5.31% year-to-date with +$343 M in net flows, whereas XEF is at 5.81% with +$3 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XGRO
+7.18%+3.76%+5.31%+25.16%+58.87%
XEF
+5.79%+1.55%+5.81%+23.48%+54.49%
Flows
XGRO
+$72 M+$244 M+$343 M+$783 M+$1,838 M
XEF
+$566 M+$2,073 M+$2,707 M+$6,122 M+$9,690 M

XGRO vs XEF exposure

Countries

XGRO
USA
38.38%
Canada
35.84%
Other
25.78%
XEF
Japan
24.24%
United Kingdom
13.87%
Switzerland
8.67%
France
8.44%
Germany
8.16%
Australia
7.08%
Other
29.54%

Sectors

XGRO
Information Technology
15.59%
Financials
14.76%
Other
9.78%
Industrials
8.63%
Other
51.25%
XEF
Financials
21.72%
Industrials
18.69%
Consumer Discretionary
8.48%
Information Technology
8.41%
Health Care
7.57%
Other
7.24%
Other
27.90%
As of April 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XGRO
NVIDIA
2.40%
APPLE
2.11%
MICROSOFT-T
1.56%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.38%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.15%
TORONTO DOMINION
0.96%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.95%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
0.89%
BROADCOM LIMITED
0.83%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.76%
XEF
ASML HOLDING
2.12%
ASTRAZENECA
1.27%
NOVARTIS
1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.17%
CH1499059983
1.17%
SHELL PLC
1.14%
NESTLE SA
1.07%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.81%
TOYOTA
0.80%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.78%

Diversification

XGRO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21,721 total
12.99%
XEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,656 total
11.55%

Characteristics

Compare
XGRO
XEF
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.84%2.31%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 21, 2007April 10, 2013

Frequently asked questions about XGRO and XEF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XGRO or XEF?
As of April 30, 2026, XGRO has returned 5.31% year to date, while XEF has returned 5.81%. XEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XGRO or XEF?
As of April 30, 2026, XGRO manages $4.57 B in assets, while XEF manages $20.16 B. XEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XGRO and XEF managed?
XGRO is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. XEF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XGRO and XEF emphasize?
XGRO is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. XEF is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XGRO or XEF?
Year to date, XGRO has seen +$343.02 M in net flows, compared with +$2,707.45 M for XEF. XEF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XGRO and XEF compare?
XGRO has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while XEF has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of XGRO and XEF?
XGRO's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. XEF's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and ASTRAZENECA.
Which ETF is more diversified: XGRO or XEF?
XGRO holds 18569 securities, while XEF holds 2476. On holdings count, XGRO is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XGRO and XEF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds