iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (XIGS) and RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XIGS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Technology, while RUSB.U leans towards Finance, Utilities, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XIGS features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.35% for RUSB.U. Performance-wise, XIGS has returned 0.65% year-to-date with +$131 M in net flows, whereas RUSB.U is at 0.74% with +$36 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $609.25 M | $259.46 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XIGS | -0.34% | -0.22% | -0.65% | +0.39% | +11.85% |
RUSB.U | -0.20% | +0.14% | +0.74% | +2.35% | +16.31% | |
| Flows | XIGS | +$9 M | +$27 M | +$131 M | +$121 M | +$561 M |
RUSB.U | +$5 M | +$10 M | +$36 M | +$41 M | +$90 M |
XIGS vs RUSB.U exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | iShares | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index 4PM - USD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.22% | 4.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 12, 2021 | October 19, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about XIGS and RUSB.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIGS or RUSB.U?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIGS or RUSB.U?
How are XIGS and RUSB.U managed?
What sectors do XIGS and RUSB.U emphasize?
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIGS or RUSB.U?
How do the fees of XIGS and RUSB.U compare?
What are the top holdings of XIGS and RUSB.U?
Which ETF is more diversified: XIGS or RUSB.U?
Recent articles about XIGS and RUSB.U

Benefiting from active management in Fixed Income
Passive index investment strategies are designed to mirror the composition and performance of a benchmark index. In contrast, active strategies can differ from the index in the pursuit of better returns.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.



