VS
Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) vs CIBC MSCI EAFE Equity Index ETF (CIEH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIN and CIEH provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.16% for CIEH. Performance-wise, XIN has returned 13.79% year-to-date with +$123 M in net flows, whereas CIEH is at 14.9% with -$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XIN
CIEH
| AuM | $1,940.17 M | $5.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.48% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.14% | -0.17% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XIN | +1.07% | -0.32% | +13.79% | +17.11% | +62.55% |
CIEH | +1.00% | -0.40% | +14.90% | +17.80% | +64.60% | |
| Flows | XIN | -$5 M | -$13 M | +$123 M | +$130 M | +$88 M |
CIEH | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$11 M | +$2 M | +$3 M |
XIN vs CIEH exposure
Countries
XIN
Japan
24.69%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Switzerland
9.56%
Germany
8.47%
France
8.36%
Other
35.20%
CIEH
Japan
24.97%
United Kingdom
13.76%
Switzerland
9.59%
Germany
8.47%
France
8.36%
Other
34.85%
Sectors
XIN
Finance
27.54%
Industrials
15.69%
Technology
13.59%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
25.76%
CIEH
Finance
27.62%
Industrials
15.82%
Technology
13.66%
Healthcare
9.62%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.86%
Other
25.41%
As of November 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XIN
US4642874659
99.94%
CIEH
US46432F8427
6.33%
ASML Holding NV
3.06%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.49%
Roche Holding AG
1.28%
Shell Plc
1.20%
Novartis AG
1.15%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.10%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.07%
Nestlé SA
1.02%
Siemens AG
0.99%
Diversification
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
99.94%
CIEH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,621 total
18.69%
Characteristics
Compare
XIN
CIEH
| Provider | iShares | CIBC |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.73% | 7.56% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2011 | January 23, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about XIN and CIEH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIN or CIEH?
As of November 4, 2026, XIN has returned 13.79% year to date, while CIEH has returned 14.90%. CIEH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or CIEH?
As of November 4, 2026, XIN manages $1.94 B in assets, while CIEH manages $5.36 M. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and CIEH managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CIEH is passively managed by CIBC. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or CIEH?
XIN holds 1 securities, while CIEH holds 647. On holdings count, CIEH is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIN or CIEH?
Year to date, XIN has seen +$122.76 M in net flows, compared with -$11.11 M for CIEH. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIN and CIEH compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while CIEH has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What sectors do XIN and CIEH emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. CIEH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.