XIN
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XIN fund page
VS
DRMD
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Full DRMD fund page

Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) vs Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIN and DRMD provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.25% for DRMD. Performance-wise, XIN has returned 13.79% year-to-date with +$123 M in net flows, whereas DRMD is at 11.54% with +$30 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XIN
+1.07%-0.32%+13.79%+17.11%+62.55%
DRMD
-1.29%-2.93%+11.54%+13.12%+68.68%
Flows
XIN
-$5 M-$13 M+$123 M+$130 M+$88 M
DRMD
+$0 M-$15 M+$30 M+$45 M-$4 M

XIN vs DRMD exposure

Countries

XIN
Japan
24.69%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Switzerland
9.56%
Germany
8.47%
France
8.36%
Other
35.20%
DRMD
Japan
24.28%
United Kingdom
13.95%
Switzerland
9.44%
France
9.26%
Germany
8.61%
Other
34.46%

Sectors

XIN
Finance
27.54%
Industrials
15.69%
Technology
13.59%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
25.76%
DRMD
Finance
27.79%
Industrials
16.00%
Technology
13.86%
Healthcare
9.69%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.38%
Non-Energy Materials
7.12%
Other
18.16%
As of November 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XIN
US4642874659
99.94%
DRMD
ASML Holding NV
3.32%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.64%
Roche Holding AG
1.32%
Shell Plc
1.27%
Novartis AG
1.25%
Schneider Electric SE
1.21%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.18%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.16%
Nestlé SA
1.15%
Siemens AG
1.15%

Diversification

XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
99.94%
DRMD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 630 total
14.65%

Characteristics

Compare
XIN
DRMD
ProvideriSharesDesjardins Investments
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodOther-
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.73%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoYes
Inception DateSeptember 6, 2011May 1, 2020

Frequently asked questions about XIN and DRMD

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIN or DRMD?
As of November 4, 2026, XIN has returned 13.79% year to date, while DRMD has returned 11.54%. XIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or DRMD?
As of November 4, 2026, XIN manages $1.94 B in assets, while DRMD manages $80.79 M. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and DRMD managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. DRMD is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or DRMD?
XIN holds 1 securities, while DRMD holds 622. On holdings count, DRMD is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIN or DRMD?
Year to date, XIN has seen +$122.76 M in net flows, compared with +$30.35 M for DRMD. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIN and DRMD compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while DRMD has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What sectors do XIN and DRMD emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. DRMD is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.

Recent articles about XIN and DRMD

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds