XIN
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XIN fund page
VS
DRMD
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Full DRMD fund page

Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) vs Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIN provides Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology exposures, while DRMD is primarily weighted in Financials, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.25% for DRMD. Performance-wise, XIN has returned 7.58% year-to-date with +$125 M in net flows, whereas DRMD is at 7.4% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 13, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XIN
+0.40%+0.90%+7.58%+20.96%+52.87%
DRMD
+1.20%+0.19%+7.40%+20.63%+58.76%
Flows
XIN
-$66 M+$86 M+$125 M+$184 M+$84 M
DRMD
+$0 M+$2 M+$0 M+$19 M-$35 M

XIN vs DRMD exposure

Countries

XIN
Japan
22.36%
United Kingdom
14.40%
Switzerland
9.39%
France
9.30%
Germany
8.90%
Other
35.66%
DRMD
Japan
22.60%
United Kingdom
14.98%
France
10.22%
Switzerland
9.46%
Germany
9.06%
Other
33.69%

Sectors

XIN
Financials
23.40%
Industrials
18.24%
Information Technology
8.47%
Consumer Discretionary
8.23%
Health Care
8.01%
Other
33.65%
DRMD
Financials
23.83%
Industrials
18.16%
Consumer Discretionary
8.66%
Information Technology
8.63%
Health Care
8.19%
Other
32.54%
As of May 13, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XIN
ASML HOLDING
2.47%
ASTRAZENECA
1.48%
NOVARTIS
1.41%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.37%
CH1499059983
1.36%
SHELL PLC
1.33%
NESTLE SA
1.24%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.95%
TOYOTA
0.93%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.91%
DRMD
ASML HOLDING
2.53%
ASTRAZENECA
1.53%
NOVARTIS
1.45%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.43%
SHELL PLC
1.37%
CH1499059983
1.33%
NESTLE SA
1.32%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.99%
TOYOTA
0.96%
SIEMENS
0.96%

Diversification

XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 690 total
13.46%
DRMD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 662 total
13.87%

Characteristics

Compare
XIN
DRMD
ProvideriSharesDesjardins Investments
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.70%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoYes
Inception DateSeptember 6, 2011May 1, 2020

Frequently asked questions about XIN and DRMD

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIN or DRMD?
As of May 13, 2026, XIN has returned 7.58% year to date, while DRMD has returned 7.40%. XIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or DRMD?
As of May 13, 2026, XIN manages $1.86 B in assets, while DRMD manages $48.40 M. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and DRMD managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. DRMD is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XIN and DRMD emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. DRMD is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIN or DRMD?
Year to date, XIN has seen +$125.18 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for DRMD. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIN and DRMD compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while DRMD has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of XIN and DRMD?
XIN's largest holdings include ASML HOLDING and ASTRAZENECA. DRMD's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and ASTRAZENECA.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or DRMD?
XIN holds 649 securities, while DRMD holds 622. On holdings count, XIN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XIN and DRMD

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds