XIN
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XIN fund page
VS
IMAX
Hamilton International Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

Full IMAX fund page

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) and Hamilton International Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (IMAX) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XIN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Industrials, and Technology, while IMAX leans towards Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for IMAX. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.00.51.01.52.02.5%Aug 3Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XIN
-0.85%+3.76%+13.19%+22.63%+59.03%
IMAX
+0.06%+3.22%---
Flows
XIN
+$4 M+$5 M+$139 M+$174 M+$89 M
IMAX
+$7 M+$21 M---

XIN vs IMAX exposure

Countries

XIN
Japan
22.80%
United Kingdom
13.92%
Switzerland
10.04%
France
8.85%
Germany
8.78%
Other
35.61%
IMAX
Japan
23.97%
United Kingdom
13.93%
Switzerland
9.72%
France
8.57%
Germany
8.50%
Other
35.32%

Sectors

XIN
Finance
28.05%
Industrials
15.78%
Technology
11.97%
Healthcare
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.29%
Other
25.95%
IMAX
Finance
27.97%
Industrials
16.12%
Technology
11.98%
Healthcare
9.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.26%
Non-Energy Materials
7.11%
Other
18.82%
As of September 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XIN
ASML Holding NV
2.91%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.66%
Roche Holding AG
1.39%
Novartis AG
1.30%
Nestlé SA
1.19%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.17%
Shell Plc
1.13%
Siemens AG
1.09%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.07%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.95%
IMAX
ASML Holding NV
2.73%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.55%
Roche Holding AG
1.30%
Novartis AG
1.22%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
Shell Plc
1.06%
Siemens AG
1.02%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.00%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.89%

Diversification

XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 674 total
13.87%
IMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,608 total
13.00%

Characteristics

Compare
XIN
IMAX
ProvideriSharesHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.74%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 6, 2011May 8, 2026

Frequently asked questions about XIN and IMAX

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or IMAX?
As of September 1, 2026, XIN manages $1.95 B in assets, while IMAX manages $24.30 M. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and IMAX managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. IMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XIN and IMAX emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. IMAX is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
How do the fees of XIN and IMAX compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while IMAX has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
What are the top holdings of XIN and IMAX?
XIN's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG. IMAX's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or IMAX?
XIN holds 663 securities, while IMAX holds 2589. On holdings count, IMAX is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds