XIN
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XIN fund page
VS
XSEA
iShares ESG MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XSEA fund page

Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) vs iShares ESG MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIN and XSEA provide the same top sector exposures: Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.25% for XSEA. Performance-wise, XIN has returned 7.4% year-to-date with +$135 M in net flows, whereas XSEA is at 9.19% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%May 5May 12May 20May 27Jun 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XIN
+1.62%+3.61%+7.40%+19.68%+53.02%
XSEA
+3.83%+5.97%+9.19%+20.88%+59.93%
Flows
XIN
+$12 M+$20 M+$135 M+$193 M+$94 M
XSEA
+$5 M+$10 M+$16 M+$43 M+$79 M

XIN vs XSEA exposure

Countries

XIN
Japan
22.83%
United Kingdom
14.35%
Switzerland
9.27%
France
9.08%
Germany
9.00%
Other
35.47%
XSEA
Japan
22.63%
United Kingdom
13.50%
Switzerland
9.82%
France
8.61%
Germany
8.42%
Other
37.02%

Sectors

XIN
Financials
23.75%
Industrials
18.74%
Information Technology
9.43%
Consumer Discretionary
8.16%
Health Care
7.38%
Other
32.54%
XSEA
Financials
25.58%
Industrials
18.82%
Information Technology
10.33%
Consumer Discretionary
8.35%
Health Care
7.41%
Other
29.51%
As of June 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XIN
ASML HOLDING
2.57%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.45%
ASTRAZENECA
1.36%
CH1499059983
1.32%
NOVARTIS
1.30%
NESTLE SA
1.20%
SHELL PLC
1.19%
SIEMENS
1.04%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.97%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.94%
XSEA
ASML HOLDING
2.83%
NOVARTIS
1.59%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.38%
SIEMENS
1.20%
CH1499059983
1.19%
NESTLE SA
1.15%
ASTRAZENECA
1.15%
ABB
1.08%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.03%
SAP SE
0.99%

Diversification

XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 691 total
13.34%
XSEA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 358 total
13.59%

Characteristics

Compare
XIN
XSEA
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CADMSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Net Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.70%2.22%
Meets ESG criteriaNoYes
Inception DateSeptember 6, 2011March 18, 2019

Frequently asked questions about XIN and XSEA

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIN or XSEA?
As of June 5, 2026, XIN has returned 7.40% year to date, while XSEA has returned 9.19%. XSEA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or XSEA?
As of June 5, 2026, XIN manages $1.87 B in assets, while XSEA manages $353.28 M. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and XSEA managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XSEA is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Net Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XIN and XSEA emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. XSEA is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIN or XSEA?
Year to date, XIN has seen +$135.44 M in net flows, compared with +$16.38 M for XSEA. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIN and XSEA compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while XSEA has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XIN and XSEA?
XIN's largest holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS. XSEA's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or XSEA?
XIN holds 651 securities, while XSEA holds 339. On holdings count, XIN is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds