XINT
iShares Core MSCI All-International Equity Index ETF

Full XINT fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

iShares Core MSCI All-International Equity Index ETF (XINT) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XINT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XINT features a management fee (MER) of 0.23%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9Sep 16Sep 23

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 25, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XINT
+0.71%----
ZUT
-4.26%-9.19%+10.91%+13.16%+49.43%
Flows
XINT
+$28 M----
ZUT
+$61 M+$80 M-$56 M-$61 M+$263 M

XINT vs ZUT exposure

Countries

XINT
Japan
16.59%
Taiwan
9.59%
United Kingdom
8.77%
Other
65.05%
ZUT
Canada
82.83%
Bermuda
17.17%

Sectors

XINT
Finance
24.85%
Technology
23.01%
Industrials
12.94%
Non-Energy Materials
7.90%
Healthcare
7.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.07%
Other
17.11%
ZUT
Utilities
82.26%
Energy
9.30%
Industrials
8.44%
As of September 25, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XINT
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.63%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.20%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.67%
ASML Holding NV
1.63%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.88%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.88%
Roche Holding AG
0.76%
Novartis AG
0.70%
Shell Plc
0.63%
Nestlé SA
0.62%
ZUT
AltaGas Ltd.
9.30%
ATCO Ltd.
9.15%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.73%
Capital Power Corp.
8.69%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.44%
Northland Power, Inc.
8.00%
TransAlta Corp.
7.98%
Emera, Inc.
7.97%
Fortis, Inc.
7.90%

Diversification

XINT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5,590 total
14.61%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.93%

Characteristics

Compare
XINT
ZUT
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Net Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.98%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 5, 2026January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about XINT and ZUT

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XINT or ZUT?
As of September 25, 2026, XINT manages $31.26 M in assets, while ZUT manages $838.99 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XINT and ZUT managed?
XINT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Net Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XINT and ZUT emphasize?
XINT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
How do the fees of XINT and ZUT compare?
XINT has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XINT and ZUT?
XINT's largest holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and SK hynix, Inc.. ZUT's top holdings include AltaGas Ltd., ATCO Ltd., and Canadian Utilities Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: XINT or ZUT?
XINT holds 5496 securities, while ZUT holds 12. On holdings count, XINT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XINT and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds