XIT
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF

Full XIT fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Compare iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIT provides Information Technology, Industrials, and Energy exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities. When evaluating costs, XIT features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, XIT has returned 17.6% year-to-date with +$68 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.89% with -$62 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XIT
-3.63%+8.17%-17.60%-5.65%+46.20%
ZUT
-1.34%+8.67%+15.89%+28.79%+38.88%
Flows
XIT
-$20 M-$7 M+$68 M+$155 M-$115 M
ZUT
+$0 M-$33 M-$62 M+$135 M+$248 M

XIT vs ZUT exposure

Countries

XIT
Canada
99.91%
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

XIT
Information Technology
73.83%
Other
25.73%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XIT
CA15101Q2071
25.64%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
23.90%
CONSTELLTION STW
23.04%
CGI INC
11.02%
DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP
4.87%
OPEN TEXT
4.42%
KINAXIS
2.21%
BLACKBERRY LTD
1.39%
LIGHTSPEED COMMERCE INC
0.89%
BITFARMS
0.80%
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

XIT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19 total
98.18%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
XIT
ZUT
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.90%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 19, 2001January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about XIT and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIT or ZUT?
As of May 12, 2026, XIT has returned -17.60% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.89%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIT or ZUT?
As of May 12, 2026, XIT manages $656.18 M in assets, while ZUT manages $875.82 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIT and ZUT managed?
XIT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XIT and ZUT emphasize?
XIT is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Energy. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIT or ZUT?
Year to date, XIT has seen +$67.56 M in net flows, compared with -$61.61 M for ZUT. XIT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIT and ZUT compare?
XIT has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XIT and ZUT?
XIT's largest holdings include SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING and CONSTELLTION STW. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIT or ZUT?
XIT holds 19 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, XIT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XIT and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds