VS
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA) and RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XMA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Materials, while RGPM leans towards Materials. When evaluating costs, XMA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.75% for RGPM. Performance-wise, XMA has returned 8.83% year-to-date with +$270 M in net flows, whereas RGPM is at 8.56% with +$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMA
RGPM
| AuM | $707.36 M | $49.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 1.02% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.75% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMA | -3.94% | -2.01% | +8.83% | +74.33% | +126.47% |
RGPM | -4.29% | -7.30% | +8.56% | +80.51% | +193.08% | |
| Flows | XMA | +$5 M | +$127 M | +$270 M | +$317 M | +$191 M |
RGPM | +$2 M | +$5 M | +$14 M | +$31 M | +$35 M |
XMA vs RGPM exposure
Countries
XMA
Canada
99.91%
RGPM
Canada
68.21%
Other
19.06%
USA
10.45%
Sectors
XMA
Materials
82.53%
Other
17.48%
RGPM
Materials
77.21%
Other
22.79%
As of May 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMA
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
15.62%
CA06849F1080
10.52%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
9.16%
FRANCO NEVADA
7.33%
KINROSS GOLD
5.64%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.58%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
3.56%
PAN AMERICAN
3.55%
ALAMOS GOLD
2.87%
LUNDIN MINING
2.59%
RGPM
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
14.08%
KINROSS GOLD
9.47%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
8.61%
BARRICK GOLD
7.02%
ALAMOS GOLD
4.95%
NEWMONT CORP
4.83%
K92 MINING
4.53%
FRANCO NEVADA
3.46%
US38059T1060
3.28%
TOREX GOLD RESOURCES
2.30%
Diversification
XMA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
66.41%
RGPM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 27 total
62.53%
Characteristics
Compare
XMA
RGPM
| Provider | iShares | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.37% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 19, 2005 | March 8, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about XMA and RGPM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMA or RGPM?
As of May 6, 2026, XMA has returned 8.83% year to date, while RGPM has returned 8.56%. XMA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMA or RGPM?
As of May 6, 2026, XMA manages $707.36 M in assets, while RGPM manages $49.50 M. XMA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMA and RGPM managed?
XMA is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD benchmark. RGPM is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XMA and RGPM emphasize?
XMA is most exposed to Materials. RGPM is most exposed to Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMA or RGPM?
Year to date, XMA has seen +$269.86 M in net flows, compared with +$13.86 M for RGPM. XMA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMA and RGPM compare?
XMA has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while RGPM has an expense ratio of 1.02%.
What are the top holdings of XMA and RGPM?
XMA's largest holdings include AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD and WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP. RGPM's top holdings include AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD, KINROSS GOLD, and WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMA or RGPM?
XMA holds 48 securities, while RGPM holds 26. On holdings count, XMA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMA and RGPM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.