VS
Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMI) vs iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XML) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMI and XML provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMI features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for XML. Performance-wise, XMI has returned 9.55% year-to-date with -$14 M in net flows, whereas XML is at 9.09% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMI
XML
| AuM | $177.06 M | $49.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.37% | 0.37% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMI | +3.83% | +1.61% | +9.55% | +14.71% | +52.91% |
XML | +5.09% | +1.77% | +9.09% | +15.56% | +51.56% | |
| Flows | XMI | -$7 M | -$2 M | -$14 M | -$9 M | -$18 M |
XML | +$8 M | +$8 M | +$12 M | +$9 M | +$10 M |
XMI vs XML exposure
Countries
XMI
Japan
25.88%
Switzerland
10.95%
United Kingdom
10.12%
Other
53.05%
XML
Japan
25.87%
Switzerland
10.94%
United Kingdom
10.12%
Other
53.06%
Sectors
XMI
Finance
23.20%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
13.82%
Healthcare
11.95%
Industrials
10.80%
Utilities
8.40%
Telecommunications
8.36%
Other
23.47%
XML
Finance
23.19%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
13.82%
Healthcare
11.95%
Industrials
10.79%
Utilities
8.39%
Telecommunications
8.36%
Other
23.50%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMI
Iberdrola SA
1.66%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.51%
Novartis AG
1.49%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.41%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1.38%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.37%
Shell Plc
1.36%
Swisscom AG
1.34%
Eni SpA
1.31%
TotalEnergies SE
1.29%
XML
Iberdrola SA
1.66%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.51%
Novartis AG
1.49%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.41%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1.38%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.37%
Shell Plc
1.36%
Swisscom AG
1.34%
Eni SpA
1.31%
TotalEnergies SE
1.29%
Diversification
XMI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 254 total
14.12%
XML
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 254 total
14.12%
Characteristics
Compare
XMI
XML
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.61% | 2.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 24, 2012 | April 5, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about XMI and XML
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMI or XML?
As of July 17, 2026, XMI has returned 9.55% year to date, while XML has returned 9.09%. XMI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMI or XML?
As of July 17, 2026, XMI manages $177.06 M in assets, while XML manages $49.54 M. XMI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMI and XML managed?
XMI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XML is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMI and XML emphasize?
XMI is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. XML is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMI or XML?
Year to date, XMI has seen -$13.72 M in net flows, compared with +$11.56 M for XML. XML has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMI and XML compare?
XMI has an expense ratio of 0.37%, while XML has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
What are the top holdings of XMI and XML?
XMI's largest holdings include Iberdrola SA, SECOM Co., Ltd., and Novartis AG. XML's top holdings include Iberdrola SA, SECOM Co., Ltd., and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMI or XML?
XMI holds 251 securities, while XML holds 251. On holdings count, XMI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.