VS
Compare iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XML) vs Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XML provides Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials exposures, while MINT is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, XML features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.45% for MINT. Performance-wise, XML has returned 9.58% year-to-date with +$13 M in net flows, whereas MINT is at 11.42% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XML
MINT
| AuM | $51.45 M | $47.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.37% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 1.23% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XML | -1.59% | +3.53% | +9.58% | +14.72% | +50.00% |
MINT | -2.14% | +0.72% | +11.42% | +21.44% | +62.96% | |
| Flows | XML | +$0 M | +$10 M | +$13 M | +$12 M | +$12 M |
MINT | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$13 M | +$6 M |
XML vs MINT exposure
Countries
XML
Japan
27.92%
Switzerland
10.38%
United Kingdom
9.46%
Other
52.24%
MINT
Japan
24.81%
United Kingdom
12.70%
Germany
10.13%
France
10.05%
Switzerland
7.97%
Other
34.33%
Sectors
XML
Finance
23.66%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
13.42%
Industrials
10.56%
Healthcare
10.50%
Energy
8.98%
Telecommunications
8.57%
Other
24.31%
MINT
Finance
28.25%
Industrials
15.26%
Non-Energy Materials
9.83%
Healthcare
8.65%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.26%
Technology
8.06%
Other
21.68%
As of September 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XML
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.51%
Iberdrola SA
1.47%
Equinor ASA
1.47%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Shell Plc
1.44%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.43%
Eni SpA
1.40%
TotalEnergies SE
1.36%
Novartis AG
1.35%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.34%
MINT
ASML Holding NV
1.95%
VINCI SA
1.48%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
1.25%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.11%
BASF SE
1.07%
Bayer AG
0.99%
ENGIE SA
0.91%
Novartis AG
0.83%
Roche Holding AG
0.78%
Standard Chartered Plc
0.76%
Diversification
XML
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 266 total
14.23%
MINT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 575 total
11.14%
Characteristics
Compare
XML
MINT
| Provider | iShares | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Total Return Index CAD Hedged - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.66% | 4.79% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 5, 2016 | April 17, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about XML and MINT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XML or MINT?
As of September 29, 2026, XML has returned 9.58% year to date, while MINT has returned 11.42%. MINT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XML or MINT?
As of September 29, 2026, XML manages $51.45 M in assets, while MINT manages $47.84 M. XML is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XML and MINT managed?
XML is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. MINT is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Total Return Index CAD Hedged - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XML and MINT emphasize?
XML is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. MINT is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XML or MINT?
Year to date, XML has seen +$13.25 M in net flows, compared with -$0.00 M for MINT. XML has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XML and MINT compare?
XML has an expense ratio of 0.37%, while MINT has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of XML and MINT?
XML's largest holdings include DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Iberdrola SA, and Equinor ASA. MINT's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, VINCI SA, and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: XML or MINT?
XML holds 263 securities, while MINT holds 564. On holdings count, MINT is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.