VS
Compare iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMS) vs JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMS provides Technology, Finance, and Healthcare exposures, while JAVA is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMS features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.44% for JAVA. Performance-wise, XMS has returned 7.08% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas JAVA is at 17.07% with +$97 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMS
JAVA
| AuM | $65.22 M | $117.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.32% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMS | +1.98% | +5.22% | +7.08% | +7.88% | +34.90% |
JAVA | +0.45% | +6.76% | +17.07% | +24.03% | - | |
| Flows | XMS | +$2 M | +$12 M | +$4 M | +$12 M | +$4 M |
JAVA | +$0 M | +$82 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
XMS vs JAVA exposure
Countries
XMS
USA
92.07%
Other
7.93%
JAVA
USA
95.72%
Sectors
XMS
Technology
29.21%
Finance
14.32%
Healthcare
13.32%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.90%
Other
32.25%
JAVA
Finance
24.14%
Technology
18.82%
Healthcare
13.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.64%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
22.12%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMS
Microsoft Corp.
1.56%
Welltower, Inc.
1.56%
Amphenol Corp.
1.55%
Chubb Ltd.
1.52%
Johnson & Johnson
1.52%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.46%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.45%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.44%
The Southern Co.
1.42%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.42%
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of America Corp.
2.62%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.55%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.51%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.46%
The Walt Disney Co.
1.43%
Diversification
XMS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 165 total
14.89%
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 153 total
28.26%
Characteristics
Compare
XMS
JAVA
| Provider | iShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.14% | 0.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 5, 2016 | March 19, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XMS and JAVA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMS or JAVA?
As of September 3, 2026, XMS has returned 7.08% year to date, while JAVA has returned 17.07%. JAVA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMS or JAVA?
As of September 3, 2026, XMS manages $65.22 M in assets, while JAVA manages $117.30 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMS and JAVA managed?
XMS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XMS and JAVA emphasize?
XMS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMS or JAVA?
Year to date, XMS has seen +$4.10 M in net flows, compared with +$96.64 M for JAVA. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMS and JAVA compare?
XMS has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of XMS and JAVA?
XMS's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Welltower, Inc., and Amphenol Corp.. JAVA's top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMS or JAVA?
XMS holds 165 securities, while JAVA holds 153. On holdings count, XMS is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.