XMTM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF

Full XMTM fund page
VS
CMOM.B
CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF

Full CMOM.B fund page

Compare iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM) vs CI U.S. Enhanced Momentum Index ETF (CMOM.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMTM provides Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare exposures, while CMOM.B is primarily weighted in Technology, Healthcare, and Energy. When evaluating costs, XMTM features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for CMOM.B. Performance-wise, XMTM has returned 15.87% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas CMOM.B is at 17.41% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.0%Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15Oct 22Oct 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XMTM
-11.99%-5.17%+15.87%+12.37%+113.00%
CMOM.B
-7.56%-1.94%+17.41%+13.79%-
Flows
XMTM
+$1 M-$4 M+$2 M-$4 M+$18 M
CMOM.B
+$0 M+$0 M-$2 M-$2 M-

XMTM vs CMOM.B exposure

Countries

XMTM
USA
96.25%
CMOM.B
USA
99.21%

Sectors

XMTM
Technology
58.74%
Industrials
9.78%
Healthcare
8.78%
Energy
8.50%
Other
14.20%
CMOM.B
Technology
50.44%
Healthcare
15.74%
Energy
8.53%
Industrials
7.78%
Finance
7.70%
Other
9.81%
As of October 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XMTM
US46432F3964
99.93%
CMOM.B
Alphabet, Inc.
7.09%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.22%
Apple, Inc.
6.07%
Eli Lilly & Co.
5.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.82%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.00%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.54%
Johnson & Johnson
3.37%
Intel Corp.
2.19%
Chevron Corp.
2.13%

Diversification

XMTM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 126 total
99.93%
CMOM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 200 total
44.63%

Characteristics

Compare
XMTM
CMOM.B
ProvideriSharesCI
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA Momentum NTR Index - CADVettaFi US Enhanced Momentum Index - USD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.54%0.33%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019January 16, 2024

Frequently asked questions about XMTM and CMOM.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMTM or CMOM.B?
As of October 30, 2026, XMTM has returned 15.87% year to date, while CMOM.B has returned 17.41%. CMOM.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMTM or CMOM.B?
As of October 30, 2026, XMTM manages $29.33 M in assets, while CMOM.B manages $9.06 M. XMTM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMTM and CMOM.B managed?
XMTM is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Momentum NTR Index - CAD benchmark. CMOM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the VettaFi US Enhanced Momentum Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMTM or CMOM.B?
XMTM holds 1 securities, while CMOM.B holds 200. On holdings count, CMOM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMTM or CMOM.B?
Year to date, XMTM has seen +$1.96 M in net flows, compared with -$1.72 M for CMOM.B. XMTM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMTM and CMOM.B compare?
XMTM has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while CMOM.B has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What sectors do XMTM and CMOM.B emphasize?
XMTM is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. CMOM.B is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Energy.

Recent articles about XMTM and CMOM.B

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds