VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM) vs CI S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMTM provides Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare exposures, while ESG.F is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMTM features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.15% for ESG.F. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMTM
ESG.F
| AuM | $29.33 M | - |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.31% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -5.89% | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMTM | -11.99% | -5.17% | +15.87% | +12.37% | +113.00% |
ESG.F | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XMTM | +$1 M | -$4 M | +$2 M | -$4 M | +$18 M |
ESG.F | - | - | - | - | - |
XMTM vs ESG.F exposure
Countries
XMTM
USA
96.25%
ESG.F
USA
96.60%
Sectors
XMTM
Technology
58.74%
Industrials
9.78%
Healthcare
8.78%
Energy
8.50%
Other
14.20%
ESG.F
Technology
49.22%
Finance
13.83%
Healthcare
11.47%
Industrials
7.83%
Other
17.65%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMTM
US46432F3964
99.93%
ESG.F
NVIDIA Corp.
13.73%
Microsoft Corp.
9.46%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.01%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.02%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.99%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.30%
Visa, Inc.
1.52%
Intel Corp.
1.48%
Walmart, Inc.
1.15%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.15%
Diversification
XMTM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 126 total
99.93%
ESG.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 325 total
42.81%
Characteristics
Compare
XMTM
ESG.F
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Momentum NTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 Scored & Screened CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.54% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | September 10, 2019 | February 14, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XMTM and ESG.F
How do the fees of XMTM and ESG.F compare?
XMTM has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while ESG.F has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What sectors do XMTM and ESG.F emphasize?
XMTM is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. ESG.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
How are XMTM and ESG.F managed?
XMTM is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Momentum NTR Index - CAD benchmark. ESG.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMTM or ESG.F?
XMTM holds 1 securities, while ESG.F holds 322. On holdings count, ESG.F is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMTM and ESG.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.