VS
Compare iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMU) vs iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMU and XMS provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials. When evaluating costs, XMU features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for XMS. Performance-wise, XMU has returned 4.04% year-to-date with -$59 M in net flows, whereas XMS is at 0.21% with -$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMU
XMS
| AuM | $330.27 M | $51.65 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.33% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.08% | 0.15% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMU | +4.19% | +3.56% | +4.04% | +6.62% | +41.91% |
XMS | +0.98% | -0.41% | +0.21% | +1.49% | +29.13% | |
| Flows | XMU | -$33 M | -$50 M | -$59 M | -$47 M | -$118 M |
XMS | +$2 M | -$11 M | -$6 M | +$0 M | -$4 M |
XMU vs XMS exposure
Countries
XMU
USA
93.64%
XMS
USA
93.27%
Sectors
XMU
Information Technology
30.32%
Health Care
12.68%
Financials
11.63%
Consumer Staples
9.95%
Utilities
7.61%
Other
27.80%
XMS
Information Technology
30.20%
Health Care
12.63%
Financials
11.59%
Consumer Staples
9.92%
Utilities
7.58%
Other
28.08%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMU
CISCO-T
1.80%
NVIDIA
1.64%
EXXON
1.60%
MICROSOFT-T
1.56%
DUKE ENERGY
1.55%
SOUTHERN
1.53%
AMPHENOL
1.50%
CHUBB LTD
1.49%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.49%
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1.47%
XMS
CISCO-T
1.80%
NVIDIA
1.63%
EXXON
1.60%
MICROSOFT-T
1.55%
DUKE ENERGY
1.54%
SOUTHERN
1.52%
AMPHENOL
1.50%
CHUBB LTD
1.49%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.48%
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1.47%
Diversification
XMU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 170 total
15.64%
XMS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 170 total
15.58%
Characteristics
Compare
XMU
XMS
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 1.20% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 24, 2012 | April 5, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about XMU and XMS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMU or XMS?
As of June 11, 2026, XMU has returned 4.04% year to date, while XMS has returned 0.21%. XMU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMU or XMS?
As of June 11, 2026, XMU manages $330.27 M in assets, while XMS manages $51.65 M. XMU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMU and XMS managed?
XMU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XMS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMU and XMS emphasize?
XMU is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials. XMS is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMU or XMS?
Year to date, XMU has seen -$59.33 M in net flows, compared with -$5.64 M for XMS. XMS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMU and XMS compare?
XMU has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while XMS has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of XMU and XMS?
XMU's largest holdings include CISCO-T and NVIDIA. XMS's top holdings include CISCO-T and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMU or XMS?
XMU holds 165 securities, while XMS holds 165. On holdings count, XMU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMU and XMS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.