VS
iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index ETF (XMU.U) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XMU.U focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while VGG leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMU.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.28% for VGG. Performance-wise, XMU.U has returned 5.71% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas VGG is at 10.52% with +$53 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMU.U
VGG
| AuM | $5.00 M | $2,536.32 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.31% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMU.U | -1.27% | +4.66% | +5.71% | +6.75% | +36.54% |
VGG | -2.18% | +0.44% | +10.52% | +12.88% | +59.14% | |
| Flows | XMU.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$3 M |
VGG | +$11 M | +$10 M | +$53 M | +$72 M | +$662 M |
XMU.U vs VGG exposure
Countries
XMU.U
USA
93.25%
VGG
USA
95.32%
Sectors
XMU.U
Technology
29.58%
Finance
14.51%
Healthcare
13.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.04%
Other
31.38%
VGG
Technology
25.95%
Finance
20.47%
Healthcare
17.68%
Industrials
9.87%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.08%
Other
16.94%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMU.U
Microsoft Corp.
1.58%
Welltower, Inc.
1.58%
Amphenol Corp.
1.57%
Chubb Ltd.
1.54%
Johnson & Johnson
1.54%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.47%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.46%
The Southern Co.
1.44%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
VGG
Broadcom Inc.
4.61%
Apple, Inc.
4.44%
Microsoft Corp.
4.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.06%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.91%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.78%
Johnson & Johnson
2.66%
Visa, Inc.
2.44%
Walmart, Inc.
2.10%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.99%
Diversification
XMU.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 165 total
15.08%
VGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 333 total
33.31%
Characteristics
Compare
XMU.U
VGG
| Provider | iShares | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.13% | 1.04% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 22, 2019 | August 2, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about XMU.U and VGG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMU.U or VGG?
As of September 17, 2026, XMU.U has returned 5.71% year to date, while VGG has returned 10.52%. VGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMU.U or VGG?
As of September 17, 2026, XMU.U manages $5.00 M in assets, while VGG manages $2.54 B. VGG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMU.U and VGG managed?
XMU.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VGG is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XMU.U and VGG emphasize?
XMU.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMU.U or VGG?
Year to date, XMU.U has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$52.62 M for VGG. VGG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMU.U and VGG compare?
XMU.U has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while VGG has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What are the top holdings of XMU.U and VGG?
XMU.U's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Welltower, Inc., and Amphenol Corp.. VGG's top holdings include Broadcom Inc., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMU.U or VGG?
XMU.U holds 165 securities, while VGG holds 331. On holdings count, VGG is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMU.U and VGG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.